The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    VAN CLEAVE: A Thanksgiving message from Russia's spy agency

  • National

    HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure

  • World

    Thailand seeks U.S. help battling insurgents

  • Politics

    Obama taking emissions goal to summit

  • Business

    Retailers banking on Black Friday

  • World

    Corruption stain puts Pakistan leader at risk

  • Politics

    Courage the turkey escapes Obama's plate

Home » Opinion

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

COMMENTARY: Facts in Iraq changing

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

kc1

Out of curiosity what is it we are going to win in Iraq? Saddam was never a real threat to us. No matter who or what constitutes the Iraqi gov't they will never be our allies. What exactly is it we're getting for our dead, wounded and money spent on Iraq? Personal I don't think the whole country was worth the life of one marine. The sooner you people stop picking my pocket for this boondoggle the better.
Mark as offensive

TomW

Mr. Barone A "surge" of articles have appeared in various newspapers recently praising the effectiveness of this strategy proposed by General Patraeus and approved By president Bush. The results of the surge are stunning albeit tenuous. Providing security to the Iraqi population is the most important job for the Iraqi government - and the biggest failure of the US invasion of Iraq. Clearly political reconciliation could not take place in the midst of a civil war. Since security dramatically improved in Iraq because of the surge, political reconciliation has followed and many of the benchmarks have been met. The Iraqi security forces have taken on greater responsibility. It seems entirely plausible to me that Iraq could have a political system modeled on Lebanese power sharing - that Iraq could develop a productive system of government. Much work needs to be accomplished, but now there is hope for a better future for all Iraqis, and yes, much better than under the brutal dictatorship of Saddam and his two sons.
Mark as offensive

kc1

Well Tom that tells me what Iraqi's get out of the war. What about America? Remember us?
Mark as offensive

TomW

kc First of all, there is nothing wrong with the Iraqis benefiting from the surge. We are the ones that invaded Iraq, and the Iraqis have born the brunt of the invasion. There has been an incredible amount of Iraqi civilian deaths and displacement (refugees to other countries and ethnic cleansing) - not to mention the 4000 (and counting) deaths of US soldiers. The biggest failure of the invasion was the complete loss of security and the resulting descent into a civil war. We have a humanitarian obligation to restore order in their country. How the US benefits from the surge and success in Iraq: 1. It is important and beneficial to limit Iranian regional hegemony. Iranian handiwork is on display in Lebanon through Hizbollah (an Iranian creation) and in Gaza through their proxy Hamas. They also have considerable sway over Syria as well. Iran certainly has similar designs in Iraq through a Shiite Islamic militia such as Sadr’s Mahdi army. The development of a powerful proxy in Iraq could enable Iran to gain access or influence over a very important oil supply, and further enable Iran to destabilize the Middle East in their war to annihilate Israel. The Iraqi government’s recent attack aimed at Sadr in Basra and Baghdad sent a strong and important message to Iran. 2. The defeat of al-Qaeda also is important to the US. When Saddam was toppled, this created a power vacuum in Iraq. The vacuum was filled by al-Qaeda and Iran as well as Syrian and other Arab interest. I find it interesting that al-Qaeda has not had much of a presence in Afghanistan - at least until recently. In my opinion, al-Qaeda considered Iraq their Midway in the war against the US and to establish their totalitarian system of Islamic rule similar to the Taliban. Fortunately for us, al-Qaeda brutality hurt their own cause - one of the main reasons that the surge has been a success. Their recent surge in activity in Afghanistan may reflect their changing interest due to their defeat in Iraq (in my opinion). 3. The US benefits from a stable Iraq. If the US leaves, this could result in a return to the chaos so prevalent over the first four years of our campaign in Iraq. If the US pulls out of Iraq - as the Democrats have threatened for the last few years - Iraq could descend into civil war as other interest move to fill the power vacuum. As has been stated on numerous occasions, Iraq could become a regional conflict. That would further embolden Iran (and our other enemies) who already carries considerable confidence as can be seen by their defiance to the world over their nuclear program. Complete US defeat is totally unacceptable in my opinion. 4. The US, the Middle East and the world benefits from a stable and peaceful Iraq for obvious reasons.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  4. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  5. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
More Top Stories »
  1. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  2. D.C. sports icon, Wizards owner Pollin dies
  3. List of W.H. state dinner guests
  4. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  3. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. The global-cooling cover-up
More Top Stories »
  1. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  2. The United Socialist States of America
  3. VAN CLEAVE: A Thanksgiving message from Russia's spy agency
  4. EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
  5. EDITORIAL: A call to prayer and repentance

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. Obama to attend Denmark climate summit
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
More Top Stories »
  1. Ky. hanging, ruled a suicide, leaves bloggers at loss for words
  2. A-listers, fundraisers at W.H. state dinner
  3. EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
  4. Obama taking emissions goal to summit
  5. 9/11 families sharply split on civilian court trials

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Redskins matchup

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.