The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Business

    Wall Street tumbles on Dubai fears

  • Local

    Private funeral Friday for Pollin

  • Politics

    Ads add heat to health care debate

  • National

    At Mall of America, it's business as usual

  • World

    Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia

  • Business

    Health, climate bills seen to stifle hiring

  • Local

    Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

EDITORIAL: Fissures on Afghanistan

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS
An Afghan soldier (center) is accompanied by Canadian troops in the International Security Assistance Force while patrolling Thursday through Arghandab, an area of Afghanistan temporarily overtaken by militants.

More Editor Favorites Stories

  • Wall Street tumbles on Dubai fears
  • Private funeral Friday for Pollin
  • Ads add heat to health care debate
  • At Mall of America, it's business as usual

By

The current anti-terrorist offensive that NATO is waging in Afghanistan should be a wake-up call for two U.S. allies in the war against al Qaeda and the Taliban. The first is the government of Pakistan, which has received upward of $10 billion in U.S. assistance since September 11, but is under intense domestic pressure not to move against the jihadists. The second is NATO, where the overwhelming majority of the organization's 26 members are failing to pull their weight in fighting the terrorists in Afghanistan.

NATO forces have scored a number of recent victories near Kandahar, Afghanistan's second-largest city. These include retaking a number of local villages that had been captured by Taliban who escaped from prison earlier this month. The Afghan government charges that the Taliban wreaking havoc near Kandahar were approximately 20 mid-level commanders from neighboring Pakistan, and that they were key strategists involved in planning suicide attacks. Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai on June 15 declared that Afghanistan has the right to send troops across the border into Pakistan to hunt down the Taliban leadership. Increasingly, U.S. and NATO forces have launched cross-border military strikes targeting Taliban forces in Pakistan.

Much of the violence and terrorism enveloping Afghanistan has its roots in Pakistan, where Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has made peaceful engagement with the Taliban a top political priority. Senior Taliban leaders and hundreds of jihadist foot soldiers have been released from prison, and the Gilani government has yielded to Taliban demands for establishment of Shariah law in the border region. Washington and Kabul have both protested Pakistan's soft approach to the Taliban, saying that it strengthens that radical ally of al Qaeda - but to no avail. So long as Pakistan remains a sanctuary for jihadists targeting Afghanistan, NATO's progress in keeping the terrorists out will be limited.

Aside from Pakistan's harmful role, the major stumbling block to military progress in Afghanistan continues to be the uneven performance of individual countries in contributing to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force there. The United States, Canada, Great Britain and Australia provide more than 35,600 of the 52,900 troops serving in the force. Most of the fighting is done by American, Canadian and British troops with assistance from the Dutch. Moreover, some European nations restrict troop movement. (Germany, for example, reportedly bars its pilots from flying at night, and its troops are prohibited from traveling more than two hours from a major medical facility.) Defense Secretary Robert Gates has lobbied Washington's NATO allies to increase their contributions, and he has achieved some important but limited successes, including yesterday's promise by Germany to increase the size of its force from 3,500 to 4,500. But Europe needs to do much more to pull its weight in Afghanistan.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
More Top Stories »
  1. D.C. sports icon, Wizards owner Pollin dies
  2. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  3. List of W.H. state dinner guests
  4. HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  2. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  3. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  4. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  5. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
More Top Stories »
  1. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  2. Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race
  3. Finance mavens gloomy
  4. Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia
  5. Global Warmists exposed

Most Commented

  1. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  2. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  5. Obama to attend Denmark climate summit
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  2. Obama taking emissions goal to summit
  3. 9/11 families sharply split on civilian court trials
  4. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  5. HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Are you planning to go shopping today?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Blades, Yoder on field

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.