- The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Top Justice Department officials looking to hire a generation of conservative entry-level lawyers rejected candidates who interned for Hill Democrats, clerked for Democratic judges, worked for liberal causes or otherwise appeared to have liberal leanings, a report said Tuesday.

Even summa cum laude graduates of Yale and Harvard were rejected for interviews because they were said to have a liberal bias, including one who spoke out against the nomination of Samuel A. Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court, according to a joint report by the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General and the Office of Professional Responsibility.

One Harvard graduate, rated as a successful intern in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, was rejected because she worked as an intern at Planned Parenthood.

A summa cum laude Harvard graduate was rejected because she worked for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. A student who was in the top 5 percent of his class at Cleveland State Law School was rejected because he had worked for Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Democrat.

But, according to the report, another Cleveland State Law School student who was in the top 20 percent of the class was accepted because his application did not identify any particular political experience or leanings.

The report also noted that a student at Stanford Law School, who graduated with distinction and had a clerkship at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, was rejected because he had clerked for a judge who had been appointed by President Clinton.

Kevin Olhson, deputy director of the Justice Department’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, complained to investigators that a “significant number” of the office’s recommended candidates “who could be construed as … left-wing” or who were “perceived, based on their applications and resumes and so forth, as being more liberal” were rejected.

Mr. Olhson told the investigators, according to the report, that he reached that conclusion based on the fact that “many of the deselected candidates had had internships with organizations such as Human Rights Watch or the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), or had assisted in defending someone held at Guantanamo Bay.”

The report concluded that Justice Department officials “inappropriately” used political and ideological affiliations to pick entry-level lawyers, eliminating candidates with Democratic Party and liberal affiliations at a “significantly higher rate ” than those with Republican, conservative or neutral ties.

Inspector General Glenn A. Fine and H. Marshall Jarrett, head of the Office of Professional Responsibility, said the selection committee used political and ideological affiliations to “deselect” candidates for the department’s Honors Program and Summer Law Intern Program (SLIP) in 2002 and 2006.

“The department’s screening committee inappropriately used political factors when considering the hiring of career attorneys, when merit should have been the sole criteria,” said Mr. Fine. “These actions undermined confidence in the integrity of the department’s hiring processes.”

Mr. Jarrett said the report “exposes the wrongdoing that occurred, and provides recommendations on how to prevent the improper infusion of partisan politics into the workings of the Honors Program and the Summer Law Intern Program in the future.”

Before 2002, career employees in each department component decided which applicants to interview and select for the Honors Program and SLIP. Under a system implemented by Attorney General John Ashcroft in 2002, a screening committee generally composed of politically appointed employees from the department’s leadership offices had to approve candidates for both programs.

In addition, political appointees in each department component were encouraged to become more involved in the hiring process, the report said.

The Honors Program is a highly competitive program for entry-level department attorneys. SLIP also is highly competitive and is designed for paid summer internships for law students.

Story Continues →