The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Blogs

BUNCH: 'War, Inc.' tries satire to sell anti-Iraq message

By Sonny Bunch (Contact) | Friday, June 27, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

It's easy to see what director Joshua Seftel and star John Cusack were going for with "War, Inc." Antiwar film after antiwar film has bombed at the box office, but they were all downers (including Mr. Cusack's own groaner, "Grace Is Gone"). What's the one antiwar film from a previous generation that everyone loves? "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb."

Perhaps satire could teach the lessons about Iraq that Hollywood so desperately wants its viewers to learn.

For an hour or so, Mr. Seftel and Mr. Cusack turn out an interesting, darkly humorous product. The invasion, occupation and rebuilding of war-on-terror target Turaqistan has been outsourced by the U.S. government to Tamerlane, a privately funded company with its own army, air force and navy. Think Blackwater if Blackwater were the size of the entire U.S. military and joined forces with Halliburton.

Working for Tamerlane is hit man and former CIA agent Brand Hauser (Mr. Cusack), on assignment to take out a meddlesome Arab businessman and on guard against Natalie Hegalhuzen (Marisa Tomei), a left-wing journalist intent on exposing the crimes of his bosses. Thrown into the mix is Central Asian pop star Yonica Babyyeah (Hilary Duff), set to be married to the son of a prominent Turaqi.



The imagery and allusions come fast and heavy - in an homage to "Strangelove," billboards promoting "Democracy Light" cigarettes dot the base; Dan Aykroyd plays a Cheneyesque former vice president in charge of Tamerlane. The humor is heavy-handed, perhaps, but consistently chuckle-inducing.

The movie unravels in the third act, however, for two reasons.

First is the shift in tone. "War, Inc." transforms from a precise satire taking a scalpel to the absurdities of the war on terror to a bludgeoning sledgehammer. The tonal shift is most apparent when, stumbling amongst the ruins of a war-torn city outside the Green Zone, Hauser and Hegalhuzen witness a Black Hawk helicopter viciously gun down a crowd of Turaqi civilians. It's obvious that Mr. Seftel and Mr. Cusack wanted to expose "the horrors of war," but it's simply too dark - the horror needs to be implied, not shoved in our faces.

The second problem is with the characters' motivations: Hauser becomes too conflicted, Babyyeah unnecessarily complex. For a satire to work, the characters need to be archetypal true believers. In "Dr. Strangelove," the characters were cardboard cutouts; the silliness of their personae and the strength of their convictions are key to the film's lasting power. Neither internal conflict nor overt brutality have a place in this kind of satire.

★★

TITLE: "War, Inc."

RATING: R (Violence, language and brief sexual material)

CREDITS: Directed by Joshua Seftel, written by Mark Leyner, Jeremy Pikser, and John Cusack

RUNNING TIME: 107 minutes

WEB SITE: www.firstlookstudios. com/films/warincb

MAXIMUM RATING: FOUR STARS

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • John and Joan Cusack appear in the satirical anti-war film "War, Inc."

Click the photo to enlarge. « Previous | Next »

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Inside the Ring
  2. Senate delays climate bill until September
  3. Health, climate reforms hit roadblocks
  4. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  5. Iranians resume protesting election result
  6. GOP hits Obama using his own words
  7. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  10. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

    Market Data

    Advertising Links
    TWT Store
    • e-edition
    • Print Edition
    • Weekly Washington Times
    TWT Affiliates
    • Middle East Times
    • Golf
    • UPI
    • Arbor Ballroom
    • Washington Times Global
    • About TWT
    • Press Room
    • F.A.Q.
    • Work for TWT
    • Advertise
    • Sponsors
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.