The award to replace 179 refueling tankers is the first of three major Air Force contracts to replace its entire fleet of nearly 600 aging tankers and could be worth $100 billion over the next 30 years.
Boeing, which was debriefed by Air Force officials Friday about why EADS and Northrop Grumman won the high-stakes deal, said yesterday that it had “serious concerns” about the fairness of the competition, citing “inconsistency in requirements, cost factors and treatment of our commercial data.”
“This is an extraordinary step rarely taken by our company, and one we take very seriously,” Mr. McNerney said.
Boeing hinted at the basis for its protest, saying that the Air Force changed its method for evaluating the two tankers even after issuing a request for proposals. These changes allowed a larger tanker to be competitive even though the Air Force originally had called for a medium-sized plane, Boeing said. Air Force officials have indicated that the larger size of the EADS/Northrop won the day.
“The Air Force“s shortsighted decision to place the future of America”s aerospace industry and national security in the hands of an illegally subsidized foreign competitor is simply wrong for America,” Mrs. Murray said.
After Boeing files its protest, the Government Accountability Office will have 100 days to issue a ruling. A protest could delay execution of the tanker contract by nearly a year, said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute, a think tank.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Sometimes life requires a paradigm twist.
We all eat, and food should be fun and healthful. Food Commune celebrates the food we eat, the people we eat with and the spirits we enjoy.
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall