The State Department has crossed a new frontier.
For decades, most of its interaction with the public consisted of speeches and occasional question-and-answer sessions, at which officials explained U.S. policies.
Now the department is soliciting outside views on some of the Bush administration’s most controversial policies, such as those on Iran, North Korea and Cuba, in a series of Web discussions on its official blog, called “Dipnote.”
It does not, however, intend to consider any of the opinions that it receives in policy-making.
Because of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s trip to the Middle East last week, one of the latest questions is: “Should the U.S. engage Hamas in the peace process between the Israelis and Palestinians?”
“The whole idea behind the blog is to try to build a community of people who are interested in reading about and discussing and providing their inputs on matters of foreign policy,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.
“There are some instances where you want to understand what’s going on out in the public,” he said. “It doesn’t mean you are doing a poll or taking a survey and you’re changing the policy.”
Most responses to the Hamas question so far have been negative and in support of the long-standing U.S. policy of not talking with terrorists.
“No, it’s clear that Hamas is not interested in peace,” wrote one respondent, who identified himself as Art in California.
Several bloggers expressed amazement that the State Department would be asking such a question, saying, “Are you people nuts?” and “What is the matter with you people?”
“I’m torn,” wrote Matt in North Carolina. “On the one hand, Hamas is clearly a terrorist organization, the type of entity we just don’t deal with. On the other hand, they are representatives for Gaza Palestine people. What other voice do they have? What a dilemma!”
Yavuz in New Jersey was categorical that Washington should engage Hamas “without a doubt,” but “maybe we should do it through some back channel or some sort of multilateral framework.”
Many of the views reflected Miss Rice’s Middle East trip, during which she accused Hamas of trying to undermine an effort to establish a Palestinian state by the end of the year, an effort begun at a peace conference in Annapolis in November. Yesterday, Miss Rice met at the State Department with her Israeli counterpart, Tzipi Livni.
Hopes for a wider truce in the Gaza Strip emerged yesterday after Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert ordered the army to scale back operations in Gaza in response to a sharp drop in Palestinian rocket fire.
Hamas has been firing rockets into Israel, which has responded with military assaults that have killed civilians as well as militants.
Egypt has been negotiating a truce with Hamas for several days. Although Miss Rice went along with Egyptian peace efforts when she was briefed on it in Cairo last week, Mr. McCormack insisted that the United States is not part of the talks.
Foreign-policy analysts were confused about the purpose of the questions on the State Department blog.
On one hand, they pointed out, the department wants to make people feel included in what it does. But on the other, it says their comments will have no effect on policy.
“I don’t understand the purpose of this blog,” said David Schenker, director of the Program on Arab Politics at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, who read the blog for the first time yesterday. “It’s essentially writing a letter to the government” without getting a response.
Michael Rubin, resident scholar in foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, said he was skeptical.
“What State is doing is trying to edge the engaging-Hamas debate into the mainstream,” he said.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.