

PITTSBURGH — Sen. Barack Obama’s purported back-channel assurances to Canada about NAFTA could hurt his campaign for union voters during the next Democratic primary, a top Pennsylvania union boss said.
“It played well in Ohio and I assume it is going to play well here in Pennsylvania,” said Pennsylvania AFL-CIO President William M. George, a Democratic Party superdelegate who has not announced his support for a presidential candidate.
He said trade deals, especially those with China, will be major concerns for voters in the April 22 primary.
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York yesterday told supporters in Harrisburg, the state capital, that the Obama campaign’s contacts with Canada about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) were part of a pattern of double talk from her rival from Illinois.
“In Ohio we just finished a campaign talking about NAFTA and trade,” she said. “My opponent said one thing in Ohio and then his top economic adviser told the Canadian government, ‘Don’t worry what he says. That’s just politics.’ ”
Mrs. Clinton said Mr. Obama also changed his position on the Iraq war, railing against it while campaigning for the Senate but voting to fund it once elected.
The Obama campaign responded that Mrs. Clinton’s renewed attack on trade proves “she is willing to do anything to win this election.”
“Senator Clinton today unleashed a kitchen sink of distorted and discredited attacks she knows aren’t true,” Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton said.
When Mrs. Clinton started her presidential campaign, he said, she reversed her support for NAFTA, which was ratified while her husband, Bill Clinton, was in the White House.
Days before the March 4 primaries in Ohio, Texas, Rhode Island and Vermont, the Obama campaign was hit with reports that a top adviser told Canadian officials to disregard the candidate’s promise to rewrite NAFTA.
“The sneaky memos and conversations with friends in Canada … gave an impression that [Mr. Obama] didn’t mean what he said,” Mr. George said.
Although it damaged Mr. Obama’s campaign in Ohio and Texas, he said, the issue was “not a big thing with me.”
He said China and Mexico, not Canada, are the chief sources of Pennsylvanians’ misgivings about trade deals.
Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama both pledge to renegotiate NAFTA, which unions blame for widespread job losses in the United States.
Mrs. Clinton won all of the March 4 contests except Vermont. The fallout from the Canada flap resonated the most in Ohio, which, like Pennsylvania, has a large number of union voters and is struggling with the loss of an industrial economy.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times
Prosecutors in their closing arguments on Saturday portrayed George W. Huguely V as a hulking ...

By Nekesa Mumbi - Associated Press
Clapping hands and swaying to gospel hymns in the church where Whitney Houston’s powerful voice ...

By George Jahn - Associated Press
Iran is poised to greatly expand uranium enrichment at a fortified underground bunker to a ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.

History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.