Letters to the Editor

America and its Eastern European allies

Helle Dale rightly asserts that waiving visa requirements for our allies in Central and Eastern Europe is indispensable (“Building strategic relationships,” Op-Ed, Wednesday). The visa-waiver program is a building block in the security structure of the region.

The collapse of the Soviet Union and the restoration of sovereignty to the nations of Eastern Europe validated Western values. It soon became apparent, however, that Russia had not reconciled its loss of empire and would seek to influence the region, although less directly than by dispatching tanks as it had done during the Cold War.

Quickly reintegrating Central and Eastern Europe into Western institutions, and thereby strengthening democracy, was the best means to advance both the geostrategic interests of the United States and the aspirations of the nations of the region. The prescience of the United States in enlarging NATO to include the former Soviet satellites and the Baltic countries became apparent as Russia began to aggressively assert itself.

In order to prevent any backsliding, the United States must continue to exercise leadership by remaining fully engaged in the region. Relatively simple steps taken to further this engagement will pay handsome dividends. These include reaching out not only to governments and the former ruling nomenklatura, but also to the people of the region, especially those who at great sacrifice helped topple the Communist regimes.

Extending the visa-waiver program to the citizens of our new allies, including Hungarians, is a critical way of shoring up their friendship toward the United States and reversing a growing cynicism caused by a feeling that America is ignoring them after the initial euphoria following the fall of the Berlin Wall. The United States needs genuine and staunch friends. Visa waiver extends the hand of friendship to our new allies.

FRANK KOSZORUS JR.

Co-president

American Hungarian Federation

Great Falls

Standing on shaky ground

As a lawyer and a soldier (Air Defense Artillery), I was astounded at the concept that Gregory D. Foster of the National Defense University advanced in his letter “Fallon’s fall” (Monday). In my civilian and military education, I have never come across the concept that the military had a right to act as a “check and balance” on civilian authority. While this concept has long been accepted in countries such as Turkey, Pakistan and many banana republics around the world, I know of no writings that would indicate it is part of U.S. military history or doctrine.

Indeed, it would be nice if all civilian leaders were “strategically literate” and not “impetuous,” but to advance the notion that there is a “social contract” that would guarantee this to the military is unsupported by the Constitution or any legal precedent.

COL. THOMAS E. COLLINS

Story Continues →