You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.
The Washington Times Online Edition

Halt strategic oil buys

Question of the Day

Who do you think, among the GOP presidential candidates, will raise the most funds?

View results

According to AAA, the average retail price of regular, unleaded gasoline reached $3.50 per gallon last week. The average price of diesel fuel is even worse — $4.20 per gallon.

Consumers face inflationary pressures at the pump, at the airline ticket counter and from the cost of transporting goods. Worse yet, the summer driving season hasn"t started.

Today"s oil prices generally reflect supply and demand. Underneath these market fundamentals, however, are several contributors to the unprecedented prices.

Growing world economies, particularly in India and China, are boosting world demand. Increased environmental regulations, geopolitical tensions and the weak U.S. dollar also contribute. In markets with limited supply, effects are even more dramatic and uncertain.

Federal government policies should not make things worse. That"s why I am sponsoring legislation that calls for temporary suspension of federal oil purchases for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, or SPR.

Future federal acquisitions would be triggered when the price of regular, unleaded gasoline is less than a nationwide average of $2.50 per gallon or diesel fuel returns to an average of $2.75 for four weeks.

S. 2927, would also ensure future government oil purchases are fiscally responsible. These common sense proposals follow recommendations by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

The SPR was initially created in the mid-1970s to protect the nation from oil-supply disruptions following the Arab oil embargo. I think we all can agree on the goal of protecting America"s energy security.

The SPR already contains 700 million barrels of oil in the salt caverns of Louisiana and Texas. Under current policy, the federal government acquires another 70,000 barrels of oil each and every day to inject underground.

While there is disagreement about the total impact to consumers, it is clear these federal acquisitions have a definite impact on price. The administrator of the Energy Information Administration recently testified that EIA modeling shows a reduction of 100,000 barrels of oil per day has an impact of $2 per barrel and 4 cents to 5 cents per gallon. Other analysts have argued that continuing to fill SPR could add as much as 10 percent to the price of oil.

When the federal government buys oil at today"s prices, it is an expensive proposition for taxpayers. The current strategy will cost $245 million per month, or nearly $3 billion per year.

This suspension will not provide the full relief consumers are seeking. But it is an important step.

The federal government"s current practice of buying tens of thousands of barrels of crude oil per day has three downfalls:

(1) It removes precious oil supplies in an already tight market.

(2) Given today"s record prices, the cost to taxpayers is enormous.

(3) The current program is administered inefficiently.

My legislation would address the first two policy faults with a temporary suspension of acquisitions. The waste is addressed through additional restrictions on future federal oil acquisitions.

The bill would require dollar-cost averaging for future oil purchases. The federal government would purchase equal dollar value of oil each month, rather than the same volume of oil each month. This practice works for individual investors. The federal government should operate with the same prudence.

Next, the federal government could save taxpayer dollars by injecting heavier grades of crude oil. The GAO has noted such a strategy would be more cost-efficient and provide more refiners with oil they can use.

If we can"t agree on these simple steps for fiscal responsibility, how will we come to agreement on the more complex solutions for energy security?

John Barrasso, Wyoming Republican, is a member of the Senate Energy and Environment Committee and Foreign Relations Committee.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Antonya Huntenburg, 21, of Hillsborough, N.J., a student at the Corcoran College of Art and Design, says everyone she knows is under some kind of economic pressure, including her parents. She says she joined the Occupy D.C. encampment on McPherson Square "to be safe." (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Youths show economic frustration in streets around the world

    By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan attends the OutServe Armed Forces Leadership Summit on Oct. 15, 2011, in Las Vegas. (Associated Press)

    Military gay group growing, aiming for more rights

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** The Rev. William E. Lori, Roman Catholic bishop of Bridgeport, Conn., gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012, before the House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing: "Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion & Freedom of Conscience." From left are, Lori, the Rev. Dr. Matthew C. Harrison, president of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, and C. Ben Mitchell, professor of Moral Philosophy Union University. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    Battle lines are drawn over whether Obama is waging a war on religion

    By Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities