Clinton's records vanished after warning of 'very serious' problems

Very tendentious. I rarely waste my time reading yelps by biased yard dogs more accustomed to feasting their own output, than red meat about incriminating evideence in unavailable or undisclosed documents. But this question is likely to become a political issue. One must ask why alleged crimes that were investigated for years and which resulted in ail for a number of people were never brought to trial (before statutes of limitations expired) by an overfunded, dedicated team of Republican footlicking prosecutors. Any country prosecutor from Mississippi would have been able to prove a number of crimes, if they actually occurred. Whose fingerprints were on the billing records? Were fragments of skin with Hillary DNA or face powder attached? Was any alleged co-conspirator (assuming there was a conspiracy) promised a deal instead of jail? Did no one cave under abuse, harassment, or torture? Tempest in a teaketle.

I had trouble figuring out if there is anything new in this story. Seems like all this came out at the time. Nevertheless, there are many issues from that era that were never adequately explained and that seem hard-to-believe. This is one of them. Records are discovered one day, out in the open, that had been missing for how long? There was an awful lot of that going on.