The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Ads add heat to health care debate

  • National

    At the Mall of America, it's big business as usual

  • World

    Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia

  • Business

    Health, climate bills seen to stifle hiring

  • Local

    Mayor Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race

  • Sports

    Terps' Friedgen faces tough road ahead

  • National

    VERSACE: Follow the shopping bags

Home » Opinion » Commentary

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Gas prices blame game

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Commentary Stories

  • Finance mavens gloomy
  • Global Warmists exposed
  • BOOK REVIEW: Life of a 'designated leaker'
  • Fed by taxes, regulations

By

With fill-ups routinely costing $60 or more, cost-conscious drivers naturally look for someone to blame. And just as naturally, politicians are happy to blame others.

Enter "Big Oil," the demagogues' favorite villain. Gas prices soaring? It's because oil companies want "excess profits," as Barack Obama puts it. Right? Wrong. The truth is more complicated.

Let's look to California, driving capital of the world. Officials there watch gas prices carefully. During March and April, a state analysis found "distribution costs, marketing costs and profits" made up about 10 cents of the cost of a gallon of gasoline, which ranged from $3.46 to $3.89. Notice that dime is less than 3 percent of the total retail cost, and profits account for only part of it. So those "excess profits" are actually well below 3 percent of retail costs.

Of course, that's little comfort to tapped-out drivers. And the big oil companies are certainly making big money — Exxon Mobil alone earned $40.6 billion last year. But such profits follow naturally when a company sells a product so many people want to buy. Some recent history offers us a bit of perspective.

In 1998, a recession in Asia created an oil glut. Prices plunged to historic lows (near $10 a barrel), and American drivers reaped the benefits, with gas dipping below $1 per gallon. So how did Exxon fare in those days of low prices?

According to Forbes magazine, Exxon earned more in profits than any other American company in 1998. Sales increased 3 percent over 1997 and profits jumped 12.6 percent, to $8.4 billion. Again, remember: Oil was remarkably cheap that year, yet Exxon earned double-digit profits. Few complained then.

The lesson is simple: When a company sells a product people want, it tends to make money, in good times and bad. For years, oil has remained a product Americans want — and today's high prices have done little to change that.

(Full disclosure: Yes, "Big Oil" gave to the Heritage Foundation last year. Their combined donations accounted for one-quarter of 1 percent of our revenues.)

It's also worth noting that oil companies are probably the most investigated companies in America. Every few years, outraged legislators demand that the Federal Trade Commission determine whether oil companies are colluding to inflate prices. Repeatedly, federal regulators find that they aren't.

A few months ago, the FTC said this about high gas prices: "All of the increase can be attributed to increased crude oil costs, because gasoline inventories are as ample as they have been for several years, gasoline consumption is declining to a near-record extent, and refining margins — the difference between the cost of crude oil and the wholesale price of gasoline — have fallen."

So who is making the big money? The countries that produce crude oil. Crude represents more than half of the cost of each gallon of gasoline sold. Federal, state and local taxes represent another fifth.

Yet some insist we punish "Big Oil." During one presidential debate, Hillary Clinton announced "the oil companies reported the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits, and I want to put them into a strategic energy fund."

But confiscating oil company profits is a lousy idea. Profits are what keep them in business. It allows them to invest in refining and delivery systems, and search for new deposits of petroleum.

Profits fuel our capitalist system as surely as petroleum fuels our national economy. Plus, "Big Oil" returns billions to stockholders through dividends, and millions of Americans own its stock through their mutual funds and 401(k)s.

The best way to cut prices in the long run would be to increase supplies. Policymakers could help do so if they would allow drilling off-shore and in a tiny section of Alaska's barren Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

It makes no sense to keep so much domestic oil off-limits, especially with prices climbing. As long as we do it, we'll pay more than we need to for each gallon of gasoline and keep sending big profits overseas. Let's stop stalling — and start drilling.

Ed Feulner is president of the Heritage Foundation.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. D.C. sports icon, Wizards owner Pollin dies
More Top Stories »
  1. List of W.H. state dinner guests
  2. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  3. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  5. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  3. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
More Top Stories »
  1. VAN CLEAVE: A Thanksgiving message from Russia's spy agency
  2. The United Socialist States of America
  3. EDITORIAL: A call to prayer and repentance
  4. White House logs point to donor access
  5. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. Obama to attend Denmark climate summit
  5. Ky. hanging, ruled a suicide, leaves bloggers at loss for words
More Top Stories »
  1. A-listers, fundraisers at W.H. state dinner
  2. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  3. Obama taking emissions goal to summit
  4. EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
  5. 9/11 families sharply split on civilian court trials

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Redskins matchup

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.