Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

‘We will act,’ Peres warns

Two events on Wednesday — Israeli President Shimon Peres’ stark warning about the Iranian nuclear threat and the State Department’s release of its latest report on terrorism — paint a chilling picture of the world that the United States may be entering in the next few years: a world in which nuclear-armed rogue states conclude that they can get away with almost anything.

“My heart shudders when I recall that there was a possibility that Hitler could acquire nuclear weapons,” Mr. Peres said in an address marking Israel’s Holocaust Memorial Day. “A leader who plans mass destruction, together with weapons of mass destruction. What would have been left of our world?”

He did not mention Iran or President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by name, aides to Mr. Peres said he was indeed referring to the Iranian regime. Although Mr. Peres has spoken out before about the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran, Wednesday’s speech in Jerusalem was still an extraordinary moment. More than half a century ago, Mr. Peres was appointed director-general of Israel’s Defense Ministry. In that position, he oversaw the construction of Israel’s nuclear weapons production complex at Dimona. But for more than 30 years, he has arguably been Israel’s most prominent political dove.

Also on Wednesday, the State Department released its annual congressionally mandated report on terrorism, which concluded that Iran remains the world’s “most active” state sponsor of terrorism, pointing to its support for organizations such as Hezbollah, the Taliban in Afghanistan, and Iraqi militias. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice noted that Iran’s role in sponsoring terror is increasing, pointing to a “belt of extremism that is Hamas and Hezbollah, [supported by] Iran, gives this [Arab-Israeli] conflict a regional dimesnion that it has not had before.”

The terrorism problems described by the State Department have manifested themselves at a time when Iran lacks nuclear arms. Should the regime obtain such weapons, Iran would dramatically increase its ability to complicate (and therefore deter) U.S. or Israeli retaliation for Iranian-sponsored terrorism. Since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, terrorism sponsored by Iran has killed thousands of people worldwide, but Tehran has never faced retaliation from the United States or any of its allies. Tehran is gambling that once it gets atomic weapons, it will diminish the likelihood of military action against its terror infrastructure to near zero.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, speaks to reporters at the Capitol following a political strategy meeting, in Washington, Tuesday, May 22, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Congress staring over edge of ‘fiscal cliff’

  • Following his attorney Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., (left) Thomas Gore, a campaign treasurer for Mayor Vincent C. Gray, makes his exit from the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse after his plea hearing in the District on Tuesday, May 22, 2012. (Rod Lamkey Jr/The Washington Times)

    Gray under cloud in campaign fraud case

  • Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican, speaks Tuesday on Capitol Hill about Startup Act 2.0, a bipartisan effort aimed at jump-starting the economy by making more visas available for immigrants with advanced degrees and those wishing to start businesses. Behind him are (from left) Sen. Mark R. Warner, Virginia Democrat; Internet entrepreneur Steve Case, a member of President Obama's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness; Sen. Jerry Moran, Kansas Republican, and Sen. Christopher A. Coons, Delaware Democrat. (Associated Press)

    Visa changes aimed at skilled workers

  • Happening Now

        Independent voices from the TWT Communities