- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
Control criminals, not guns
Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, in a letter to the state congressional delegation demanding re-enactment of the federal assault weapon ban, said: “Passing this legislation will go a long way to protecting those who put their lives on the line every day for us. … There is no excuse to do otherwise.”
Gun control laws will not protect us from murderers. We need protection from the criminal justice system politicians have created. Let’s look at it.
According to former Philly cop Michael P. Tremoglie’s May 8 article “Who freed the cop-killers?” in the Philadelphia Daily News, all three murder suspects had extensive criminal records. Levon Warner was sentenced in 1997 to 7 1/2 to 15 years for robbery, one to five years for possessing an instrument of crime and five to 10 for criminal conspiracy. Howard Cain was convicted in 1996 on four counts of robbery and sentenced to five to 10 years on each count. Eric Floyd was sentenced to five to 10 years in 1995 for robbery, rearrested in 1999 for parole violation and convicted in 2001 for two robberies.
If these criminals had not been released from prison, long before they served out their sentences, Officer Liczbinski would be alive today.
So what’s responsible for his death: guns or a prison and parole system that released these three criminals?
Mr. Tremoglie cites other examples of criminals, with convictions for violent crimes ranging from robbery and assault to murder, who were paroled and later murdered police officers.
A New York Times study published April 28, 2006, of the city’s 1,662 murders in 2003-05 found 90 percent of the murderers had criminal records. A Massachusetts study reported that on average, homicide offenders had been arraigned for nine prior offenses. John Lott’s book, “More Guns, Less Crime,” reports that in 1988 in the 75 largest counties in the United States, more than 89 percent of adult murderers had a criminal record as an adult.
A few days after the murder of Officer Liczbinski, Gov. Rendell told a news conference, attended by state elected officials and top law enforcement officials, “The time has come for politicians to decide. You have to decide whether you’re on their side - the men and women who wear blue - or whether you’re on the side of the gun lobby.” Instead of saying “whether you’re on the side of the gun lobby,” Mr. Rendell should have said “whether you’re on the side of the criminal and the courts, prosecutors, prisons and parole boards that cut soft deals with criminals and release them to prey upon police officers and law-abiding citizens.”
If there is one clear basic function of government, it’s to protect citizens from criminals. When government failure becomes so apparent, as it is in the murder of a police officer, officials seek scapegoats and very often it’s the National Rifle Association and others who seek to protect our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. We hear calls for stricter gun control laws when what is really needed is more control over criminals.
There are many third-party liability laws. I think they ought to be applied to members of parole boards who release criminals who turn around and commit violent crimes. As it stands now, people on parole boards who release criminals bear no cost of their decisions.
I bet that if members of parole boards were held liable or forced to serve the balance of the sentence of a parolee who goes out and commits more crime, they would pay more attention to the welfare of the community rather than the welfare of a criminal. You say, “Williams, under those conditions, who’d serve on a parole board?” There’s something to be said about that.
Walter E. Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist and professor of economics at George Mason University.
Why such hatred toward America's freedom of religion?
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Activists encourage Obama to circumvent Congress, use more executive authority
- Obama: Nelson Mandela now 'belongs to the ages'
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- GOP launches candidate training: How to talk to women
- Increase in battlefield deaths linked to new rules of engagement in Afghanistan
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Understanding economic events with a free market explanation
John Wood illustrates a new American politics, and the path to get there.
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
White House pets gone wild!