- Iran’s Rouhani: Israel, Islamic State are ‘tumors derived from the same origin’
- Rep. Tim Murphy: GOP knew HealthCare.gov would be an ‘unmitigated disaster’
- Political speak: Planned Parenthood dumps ‘pro-choice’ for ‘women’s health’
- U.S. attorney warns Cuomo not to interfere with anti-corruption probes
- Investigators reach Ukraine jet crash site
- Ohio gives Obama a thumbs down; Hillary Clinton tops GOP all-stars: poll
- Jesse Ventura suggests suit not over; HarperCollins could be next
- ‘No American is proud’ of certain CIA tactics: State Department
- Drug-filled drone crash outside S.C. prison sends police on alert
- GOP to Obama: Take your ‘golf cap off’ and get down to coal country
Scientists witness explosion of star
Question of the Day
In a stroke of cosmic luck, astronomers for the first time witnessed the start of one of the universe’s most fiery events: the end of a star’s life as it exploded into a supernova.
On Jan. 9, astronomers used a NASA X-ray satellite to spy on a star already well into its death throes, when another star in the same galaxy started to explode. The outburst was 100 billion times brighter than Earth’s sun.
The scientists were able to get several ground-based telescopes to join in the early viewing and the first results were published in today’s issue of the journal Nature.
“It’s like winning the astronomy lottery,” said lead author Alicia Soderberg, an astrophysics researcher at Princeton University. “We caught the whole thing from start to finish on tape.”
And what a death blast it is.
“As much energy is released in one second by the death of a star as by all of the other stars you can see in the visible universe,” Mr. Filippenko said.
Less than 1 percent of the stars in the universe will die this way, in a supernova, said Mr. Filippenko, who has written a separate paper awaiting publication.
Most stars, including our sun, will get stronger and then fade slowly into white dwarfs, what Mr. Filippenko likes to call “retired stars,” which produce little energy.
The first explosion of this supernova can be seen only in the X-ray wavelength. It was spotted by NASA’s Swift satellite, which looks at X-rays and happened to be focused on the right region, Ms. Soderberg said.
The blast was so bright that it flooded the satellite’s instrument, giving it a picture akin to “pointing your digital camera at the sun,” she said.
The chances of two simultaneous supernovae explosions so close to each other is maybe 1 in 10,000, Ms. Soderberg said. The odds of looking at them at the right time with the right telescope are, well, astronomical.
Add to that the serendipity of the Berkeley team viewing the same region with an optical light telescope. It took pictures of the star about three hours before it exploded.
This new glimpse of a supernova seems to confirm decades-old theories on how stars explode and die, not providing many surprises, scientists said. That makes the findings “a cool thing,” but not one that fundamentally changes astrophysics, said University of California at Santa Cruz astrophysicist Stan Woosley, who wasn’t part of the research.
By Ted Cruz
Israel saves its enemies; Hamas endangers its friends
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- GOP report sees ties between rich donors, green 'nonprofits'
- NAPOLITANO: Is the president incompetent or lawless?
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- House votes to sue President Obama over claims of presidential power
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world