The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > National

Legal aid groups struggle to meet low-income need

By Tom Ramstack | Friday, May 23, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Legal aid representatives described to the Senate yesterday their struggle to represent low-income Americans as a housing crisis and slow economy leave a growing number of people with more legal problems than they can handle.

At least half of the eligible applicants to nonprofit organizations such as Legal Aid Bureau get turned away because the nonprofits lack funding, according to Legal Services Corp., the agency that gives federal grants to legal assistance groups.

Typically, the applicants seek legal representation to avoid foreclosure, get help for a disabled family member or find protection from an abusive relationship, according to witnesses at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

"Because we are unable to assist them, they have nowhere else to go," said Helaine M. Barnett, president of the Washington-based Legal Services Corp.

Recent wildfires, hurricanes and tornadoes have added to the number of people who need lawyers to represent them, the group says.

Congress is giving Legal Services Corp. $350 million in the current fiscal year, but the agency is asking for $471 million for fiscal 2009.

The presidents of the 50 state bar associations recently wrote a letter to congressional leaders asking for increased funding, saying the annual appropriation for Legal Services Corp. has not kept pace with inflation since the 1990s.

Subprime mortgages have led to widespread foreclosures among low-income Americans, they said.

Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin, Maryland Democrat, suggested that state bar associations take a more active role in offering free legal service to low-income people, possibly with a requirement that licensed attorneys provide the service.

Legal Services Corp. is asking for more money while it still is trying to clear its reputation after recent government reports accused its board of directors of failing to maintain professional accountability standards.

A government report in March indicated Legal Services Corp. might not be using its funding effectively.

Some agencies that received grants used the money to give staff members interest-free loans, to pay late fees on overdue bills and to pay lobbyist registration charges, according to a Legal Services Corp. inspector general's report. It accused Legal Services Corp. of failing to monitor grantee agencies appropriately.

A Government Accountability Office report in December said the agency's "governance and accountability breakdowns can result in a lack of trust from donors, grantors and appropriators, which could ultimately put funding ... at risk."

Legal Services Corp. officials said they have reformed their oversight procedures by approving a new code of ethics for agencies receiving grants and establishing a separate audit committee.

Concerns about whether more federally subsidized lawsuits by low-income people are the best method of representing their interests were raised during the Senate hearing by Kenneth F. Boehm, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a conservative public policy foundation.

Mediation without lawyers and charitable assistance from private law firms could be better options, he said.

"The alternatives generally are faster, they're more effective," Mr. Boehm said.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Boehm
  • Barnett

Click the photo to enlarge. « Previous | Next »

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  5. Israeli know-how
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. Chaos theory -- and practice
  8. Young Cons a YouTube surprise hit
  9. Ouster a threat for Md. GOP chairman
  10. Jurors view tape of Jefferson taking briefcase

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.