The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Election

Obama helped defeat anti-affirmative action

By Valerie Richardson (Contact) | Saturday, November 8, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

DENVER | Ward Connerly says his anti-affirmative-action movement wouldn't have taken its first ballot defeat if not for a buzzsaw named Barack Obama.

Mr. Connerly said Mr. Obama's organization mobilized unprecedented numbers of Democrats who blocked his bid to add Colorado to four states that have banned affirmative action.

"Colorado essentially went blue this time around, but we still drew over a million votes," Mr. Connerly, a black businessman and former University of California regent, told The Washington Times. "I'm very heartened by this. I'm just sorry we got caught up in the Obama phenomenon."

Once a solidly Republican red state, Colorado went blue this year as voters backed Mr. Obama over Republican John McCain by a margin of 53 percent to 47 percent. The Obama campaign targeted Colorado early on as a potential flip state and invested heavily in voter-registration and get-out-the-vote efforts.

Mr. Connerly's Sacramento-based American Civil Rights Institute did succeed in Nebraska on Tuesday, where an anti-preferences measure overcame efforts by such Nebraska heavyweights as investor Warren Buffet to defeat it - joining California, Michigan and Washington with such bans.

Another factor working against the Colorado measure was the size of the state ballot. Colorado boasted the longest ballot in the nation, with 14 initiatives, including 10 proposed constitutional amendments.

All but four of the measures failed in what some analysts described as a "forget about it" reaction by overwhelmed voters. Two of the initiatives that did pass were standard housekeeping proposals aimed at cleaning out obsolete state laws.

"We got caught up in those two factors," Mr. Connerly said. "If the election were held tomorrow and there were no Obama on the ticket, and you didn't have people telling voters to 'just say no' to all the initiatives, we'd win by 18 points."

Indeed, Amendment 46 was polling at more than 60 percent just two weeks ago.

But the results show that Colorado "stands for a different set of values than this initiative," said Melissa Hart, the University of Colorado law professor who co-chaired the anti-Amendment 46 campaign.

She agreed that the Obama candidacy affected the outcome, but that didn't make the defeat of Amendment 46 any less legitimate.

"I think it's true that the Obama campaign brought out a lot of new Colorado voters, and when voters of all ilks took a look at [the amendment], they said, 'We don't want this in our constitution,'" Ms. Hart said. "Obama voters are still Colorado voters, and that's what they think."

The anti-46 campaign also benefited from the support of Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter and Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper. Ads had warned voters against amending the constitution at the behest of a California-based group.

"I'm really proud of the voters of my state," Ms. Hart said. "We went door to door, voter to voter, telling people not to fall for the deception, and they didn't."

With several thousand provisional ballots still uncounted, Amendment 46 was failing by a margin of about 50.5 to 49.5 percent. The campaign had not officially conceded yesterday, but was getting close to that point, said Colorado co-chairperson Jessica Peck Corry.

Foes of affirmative action had some cause for celebration. In Nebraska, voters approved Initiative 424, an anti-preferences measure identical to the Colorado amendment, by a margin of 58 percent to 42 percent.

"You didn't have the far left really going all out for Obama and working to defeat us" in Nebraska, Mr. Connerly said.

The group had originally planned a "Super Tuesday for Civil Rights" with proposals in five states, but was only able to qualify for the Colorado and Nebraska ballots.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Ward Connerly waits in Lincoln, Neb., Tuesday for the final vote tally on Initiative 424, which he promoted to eliminate affirmative action in Nebraska. The effort passed there and failed in Colorado. (Associated Press)

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. Inside the Ring
  3. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  4. Senate delays climate bill until September
  5. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  5. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  6. Israeli know-how
  7. YON: Girl with no future
  8. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  9. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  10. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.