Chances dim for lame duck session

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By S.A. Miller and David M. Dickson, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Although the nation's faltering economy was the No. 1 issue during the presidential election, Congress may be unable to call a special session this year to address the situation.

Congressional leaders said that time was running short to convene a so-called lame-duck session. On Monday, Democrats and the White House failed to negotiate a breakthrough over economic stimulus measures that President Bush would be willing to sign into law.

Without such an agreement, both sides said the chances for holding a special session were slim.

Democratic leaders are pushing a $100 billion plan that includes an extension of unemployment benefits, an increase in Medicaid payments to states, and New Deal-style projects to build schools, highways and bridges.

Democrats also are looking to give more aid to U.S. automakers on top of the $25 billion in government loans approved before the election to help the ailing Big Three.

The president balked at many of the proposals, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, has said she will not call a lame-duck session unless the White House acquiesces.

"There is no change yet from the White House," a top House leadership aide said. "There are a number of things to work out ... but positive discussions are happening."

House rules require notice of a legislative session by midweek in order to convene the chamber next week. That is the most likely time for a lame-duck session, since lawmakers are already scheduled to return to Washington to elect their new leaders.

But the White House has greeted Democrats' lame-duck stimulus plan with skepticism. "We want to do it," said Brendan Daly, a spokesman for Mrs. Pelosi. "But if Republicans plan to block it in the Senate, we won't even bring it up in the House."

The White House said it was up to the Democrats to decide how to proceed with an economic stimulus.