Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Gun-camera bill hits obstacles

The D.C. Council concluded its inquiry Wednesday into whether to place cameras on police weapons but prospects for a vote on the estimated $4 million plan are uncertain amid police opposition and a $131 million budget gap.

A top Metropolitan Police Department internal affairs officer testified last week against the program to equip about 4,000 police weapons with miniature cameras that record video and sound when a gun is drawn. The 5-ounce “PistolCams” emit a bright red laser along the gun’s line of fire within two seconds of the weapon being drawn.

But council member Yvette Alexander, Ward 7 Democrat and member of the Committee on Public Safety and Judiciary, where the bill currently rests, says that the cameras will be instrumental in investigating cases of excessive force.

“When it comes to investigations, a camera would capture a lot more than no camera at all,” she said.

The department says that the cameras will not be helpful in probing the use of force.

“We believe that there will be very limited circumstances where a gun camera will actually prove useful to the investigation of the use of force,” said Peter Newsham, assistant chief of Internal Affairs for the Metropolitan Police.

Mr. Newsham said the two-second delay between when the gun is drawn and when the camera begins recording would prevent the camera from capturing the most important seconds of a police shooting.

“Two seconds is a great deal of time when considered in the context of a police shooting, a two-second delay may prevent the camera from capturing valuable information,” he said.

Concerns about the delay can be worked out with police, said council member Harry Thomas Jr., the Ward 5 Democrat who introduced the bill in May.

“Missing two seconds of evidence is bad, but having no evidence is worse,” he said.

Miss Alexander said eyewitness accounts can help fill the two-second void in many cases.

The bill will have to be reintroduced next year if the council doesn’t vote on it by Dec. 16, the end of the current session.

There is currently no scheduled committee vote on the bill, and there are concerns that the bill will be buried under more pressing budget matters.

Council member Phil Mendelson, an at-large Democrat who heads the council’s Committee on Public Safety, has estimated that the plan will cost $4 million.

To fill the $131 million budget gap, D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty has proposed freezing or eliminating vacant jobs and has revived a controversial D.C. Lottery contract rebidding plan that has faced council opposition in the past.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • President Obama speaks Feb. 13, 2012, about the "Community College to Career Fund" and his 2013 budget at Northern Virginia Community College in Annandale, Va. (Associated Press)

    Obama unveils fiscal 2013 budget proposal

    By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times

  • President Barack Obama speaks about the "Community College to Career Fund" and his 2013 budget, Monday, Feb. 13, 2012, at Northern Virginia Community College in Annandale, Va. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

    Social Security reserves forecast to run dry in 2022

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now