Gun-camera bill hits obstacles

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By Michael Drost THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The D.C. Council concluded its inquiry Wednesday into whether to place cameras on police weapons but prospects for a vote on the estimated $4 million plan are uncertain amid police opposition and a $131 million budget gap.

A top Metropolitan Police Department internal affairs officer testified last week against the program to equip about 4,000 police weapons with miniature cameras that record video and sound when a gun is drawn. The 5-ounce "PistolCams" emit a bright red laser along the gun's line of fire within two seconds of the weapon being drawn.

But council member Yvette Alexander, Ward 7 Democrat and member of the Committee on Public Safety and Judiciary, where the bill currently rests, says that the cameras will be instrumental in investigating cases of excessive force.

"When it comes to investigations, a camera would capture a lot more than no camera at all," she said.

The department says that the cameras will not be helpful in probing the use of force.

"We believe that there will be very limited circumstances where a gun camera will actually prove useful to the investigation of the use of force," said Peter Newsham, assistant chief of Internal Affairs for the Metropolitan Police.

Mr. Newsham said the two-second delay between when the gun is drawn and when the camera begins recording would prevent the camera from capturing the most important seconds of a police shooting.

"Two seconds is a great deal of time when considered in the context of a police shooting, a two-second delay may prevent the camera from capturing valuable information," he said.

Concerns about the delay can be worked out with police, said council member Harry Thomas Jr., the Ward 5 Democrat who introduced the bill in May.

"Missing two seconds of evidence is bad, but having no evidence is worse," he said.