The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Justices weigh juveniles' life without parole

  • National

    Leadership changes at the Times

  • National

    Hood suspect earlier came under scrutiny

  • National

    PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil

  • World

    Envoy: Europe relies on U.S. shield

  • National

    'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort

  • Business

    Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush

Home » News » Editor Favorites

Friday, November 14, 2008

Lawmakers rip Fed's 'bait-and-switch'

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

RHNH

Angry??? Then fill the positions on the Oversight Committee and do your jobs.
Mark as offensive

RDH

Who better to make the financial decisions than 535 members of Congress, all of which are economic geniuses? In particular we should allow Chris Dodd and Barney Frank to make them. Barney still has his dice. Sure it turned out when he said he was "willing to roll the dice with sub-prime loans" wrt Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that he crapped out. So what if Alan Greenspan's warnings about Fannie and Freddie came true (Barney thus helped Fannie and Freddie "put the entire financial system in peril" with his gamble). It only cost us tax payers $700 billion (some are now saying $5 trillion). Who cares. This time Barney just might be a winner!
Mark as offensive

MET9

Since when has the master cared about what the slaves think. Every elected official in congress and the white house has accepted money from these very same special interests that are profiting so handsomely from our tax-dollars. All the while that they are making sure that their banking buddies are able to give more credit, I can't help but notice a very distinct silence on the question of how an American population that has been having its pockets sucked dry by job losses, increased prices and investment failures is goingto be able to repay any future lines of credit. I might be mistaken, but it seems to me that no matter how much credit is given, none of it will matter if people no longer have the means to repay it. For a consumer based economy, our elected officials are paying no attention to what really makes this country go. It really is too bad that our politicians pretty much sold the American way of life to wall street for the price of campaigne contributions and now the rest of us are slaves being forced to feed their appetites of greed.
Mark as offensive

smrs

When the money was going to buy assets at least the taxpayers got something for their money - now I know the taxpayers would never see that money but just maybe the returns might have gone towards the deficit. After this switch, taxpayers are giving banks money and get nothing in return. And Paulson (DEMOCRAT) knew that he was going to pull this switch from the beginning and lied to the American people to get the money. This is crazy the economy is tanking because people don't have any extra money to spend so what are the Democrats promising to do...take even more money from us!
Mark as offensive

mesquito

To bail out the auto industry would be the biggest mistake ever. The problem is, the industry needs people to BUY the cars! Where, more specifically who would benefit from another bailout of the industry? Just the corporate fatcats! People are buying care - like we just did - but from Toyota and Nissan who provide quality cars with much higher gas mileage. We bought a 2008 Altima 4 cy 2.5SL in August and, get this, while driving home from Washington state where we bought the car, we drove from Reno NV to Las Vegas NV on 3/4 tank of gas!!!! That's over 480 miles and we still had enough gas to get home to Mesquite 80 miles away. Now what american made car can do that??? None nada, yilch! The industry needs people to buy their cars, not a bail out but they also need to provide a fuel efficient car or truck.
Mark as offensive

Jaeger

My congressman voted against the mess --- it did no good, given his colleagues' hysteria, but at least, history will judge him as sensible. I'll just bet there are a lot of pols who voted for this so-called bailout that really feel like a bunch of suckers. This whole bailout fiasco is the perfect nexus of a major crisis, an election year, panicked decision-making, political self-interest, greed, myopia, and stupidity. Only that can explain how a bipartisan group of Congressmen and an unpopular President could borrow (because our Treasury doesn't just have it sitting there) $700,000,000,000 and give it away to a bunch of civil service bureaucrats who may or may not have any qualifications to manage such a mindblowing sum. If every parent in American completely drained their children's college fund and any other assets set aside for the future for their kids and just blew it on a big party, that sum probably wouldn't even be scarcely a fraction of this bailout. Yet, that is exactly what we just did as a nation --- to spare a few years hardship and give some big corporations some credit, we just mortgaged our children's future with this bailout. With this, the federal government's past 40 years of deficit spending, and the coming government entitlement programs meltdown, our generation has just loaded on the back of every single child living today with an refrigerator, an anchor, and an anvil that they will have to carry. But that's not all, their children, not even born yet, will also bear this as well --- perhaps even double. They are all fated to pay trillions and trillions of dollars in taxes that, from their point of view, will seemingly go to nothing --- what it will be going to though will be servicing this current government's debts and its compounding interest. Or, in other words, ironically, their own parents' incontinence, folly, and carelessness.
Mark as offensive

xpress_yourself

The elitist illuminati got everyone all happy about the bailout, well the banks and businesses, then they pulled the ultimate flip flop, and I'm not surprised.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
More Top Stories »
  1. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  2. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution
  3. House OKs health reform bill
  4. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  5. Parents buying homes for kids at college
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. The enemy at home
  4. After the Berlin Wall: German unity proves elusive
  5. Patent case goes to Supreme Court

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
  5. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
More Top Stories »
  1. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  2. Suspected Fort Hood shooter is awake, talking
  3. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  4. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  5. The enemy at home

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No interest in Johnson

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.