The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion > Editorials

EDITORIAL: Trade with South Korea

By | Friday, November 14, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

President-elect Barack Obama has an opportunity to give the U.S. economy an immediate stimulus by encouraging Congress to pass the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Rather than promising more taxpayer money to bail out faltering corporations, Mr. Obama could push for trade with South Korea, the 11th largest economy in the world and already America's seventh-largest trading partner. The former has huge costs, the later huge potential benefits.

There are currently four free-trade agreements - with Colombia, Peru, Panama and South Korea - that are awaiting congressional approval. Of these, the biggest prize for America is revision of the South Korean trade pact that expired in June. Korea's trade with America is almost three times the combined trade volumes of Peru, Panama and Colombia. A free-trade pact would give American automakers and farmers, in particular, access to Korean markets with vastly reduced or entirely eliminated tariffs.

Mr. Obama does not need to defend his support for the pact if he is questioned about appearing to backpedal from his campaign pronouncements. During the campaign, Mr. Obama repeatedly affirmed his commitment to free trade, but he said some trade agreements need to be revised to ensure labor and environmental standards. The U.S.-Korea pact includes "the labor and environmental provisions" required by the United States.

South Korean Ambassador Lee Tae-sik told editors and reporters of The Washington Times on Monday that there should be no fear that American companies will relocate to Korea at the expense of American workers because South Korea "is not a low-wage nation." He said the pact will create jobs for both Americans and Koreans. He also pointed out that South Korea is currently negotiating trade deals with the EU, Canada and India, among others, and that America should not relinquish market opportunities while other nations capitalize on them.

Mr. Obama has said it is essential that the U.S.-Korea pact provide sufficient safeguards for America's auto industry. Mr. Lee notes that the free-trade agreement has much support among America's leading automakers, including General Motors, which currently holds 12 percent of the Korean auto market. In addition, Hyundai generates 3,300 jobs in Alabama and Kia will create of 2,500 jobs in Georgia following the completion of a plant there in 2009.

It is also well to consider that the evolution of South Korea's free market and democratic society may, in the long run, provide inspiration to North Korea to abandon its authoritarian regime. Why not show the North Korean regime how prosperity can be created for all when nations demonstrate goodwill and engage in free and open trade?

There is no reasonable rationale for Mr. Obama and Congress to stand in the way of a trade pact that mutually benefits Americans and South Koreans - and that has the potential to help revolutionize Northeast Asia during these uncertain times in a global economy.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • A North Korean soldier keeps an eye Thursday on the South Korean side at the border village of Panmunjom, South Korea. (Associated Press)

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Inside the Ring
  2. Senate delays climate bill until September
  3. Health, climate reforms hit roadblocks
  4. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  5. Iranians resume protesting election result
  6. GOP hits Obama using his own words
  7. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  10. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.