- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Obama camp changes tax-cut beneficiaries
Barack Obama’s middle-class rescue plan is turning into the incredible shrinking tax cut because its original beneficiaries have been reduced in the past few months from taxpayers making less than $250,000 to those earning much less.
The freshman senator, who has made his “middle-class tax cut” the core of his economic agenda, has used differing qualifying income figures in his speeches and ads to identify which income group would see its taxes cut under his proposal. In one TV ad, he reduced the plan’s $250,000 threshold by as much as $50,000.
Then, in an interview last week, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, his vice presidential running mate, appeared to cut the income eligibility figure to $150,000, followed by Obama campaign surrogate Bill Richardson, the tax-cutting governor of New Mexico, who further lowered the definition of middle class to $120,000 or less.
“At this rate, it won’t take long until Obama is again raising taxes on Americans making as little as $42,000 a year,” said Alex Conant, the Republican National Committee’s spokesman, referring to Mr. Obama’s vote for a Democratic budget resolution that would have let most of President Bush’s tax cuts expire, effectively raising income taxes on Americans making $41,500, according to FactCheck.org.
The Obama tax plan’s descending income thresholds has not escaped the notice of Sen. John McCain’s campaign, nor the RNC’s army of researchers, who were sending out a drumbeat of press releases all week, monitoring the time and place of the Obama campaign’s changing numbers. Among those changes:
— In July: “If you make $250,000 a year or less, we will not raise your taxes. We will cut your taxes,” Mr. Obama said in remarks at Powder Springs, Ga.
— In October: “If you have a job, pay taxes and make less than $200,000 a year, you’ll get a tax cut,” Mr. Obama said in a TV ad titled “Defining Moment” that has been running across the country.
— Last week: “What we’re saying is that [Mr. Bush’s tax cuts to the wealthy] … should go to middle-class people - people making under $150,000 a year,” said Mr. Biden in an interview with WNEP in Scranton, Pa.
— Friday: Mr. Obama “is basically looking at $120,000 and under [as] among those that are in the middle class and there is a tax cut” for them, Mr. Richardson said on KOA-AM in Denver.
The Obama campaign’s varying words on who would be eligible for Mr. Obama’s tax cuts left economists Friday scratching their heads and wondering just who would benefit and who would not.
“Every time we look, his plan changes. Anything is possible,” said McCain economic adviser Kevin Hassett at the American Enterprise Institute.
The Obama campaign denied moving away from the senator’s original tax-cut plan. It said Friday that Mr. Richardson “simply misspoke” when he used the $120,000 figure and “meant to say people making less than $250,000 won’t see their taxes increased.” The statement said: “Senator Obama wouldn’t raise taxes on families making less than $250,000.”
However, other economic analysts said that the Obama campaign’s declining income eligibility levels for his tax cuts raises troubling questions about Mr. Obama’s promise to give tax cuts to 95 percent of all taxpayers.
“A lot of people may vote for Obama thinking they are going to get a tax cut are going to get a tax hike,” said Phil Kerpen, director of policy at Americans for Prosperity, a free-market advocacy group.
“What is clearly going on here is the changing definition of what constitutes the middle class,” said economist Bruce Bartlett, adding that “the vast majority of Americans say they are middle class and very few think of themselves as either rich or poor.”
About the Author
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow