Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

CROMER: Where Obama wants to go

President Barack Obama (Getty Images)President Barack Obama (Getty Images)

OP-ED:

As a beaming President-elect Barack Obama gazed out at the sea of Americans that had gathered on election night in Chicago’s Grant Park to revel in his meteoric ascendance to the White House, the emotionally-charged triumph was awe inspiring.

Yet I couldn’t help flashing back to another emotional sea of humanity - the one that three years earlier surged through New Orleans seeking shelter and salvation from Hurricane Katrina.

Despite the striking contrasts of hope and anguish, the promise displayed in Grant Park on election night verses the tragedy that unfolded in the Super Dome and all along the Gulf Coast in August of 2005, both flowed from a common well that now runs deep in America: the belief that the government can - and will - protect us.

Protect us from natural disasters, protect us from foreign terrorists and enemy states, protect us from a collapsing economy, protect us from street hoodlums, protect us from a dying environment and, ultimately, protect us from ourselves through legislation designed to blunt our lack of self-restraint and disinterest in self-reliance.

Indeed, in the passionate and emotional faces evident throughout the massive crowd that gathered to hear Mr. Obama’s victory speech, there could be seen the reflection of the desperate faces that peered from the roof tops in New Orleans; of the stranded men and women holding up bed sheets with the word ‘Help!’ scrawled across them.

For all the soaring rhetoric that has greeted Mr. Obama’s election and its historic implications for our nation, the underlying message from the majority of the American electorate is as inescapable as those bed sheets held skyward on the rooftops of a flooded New Orleans.

I hate to be a buzz kill this early at the party, but the bad news is that our young president is going to find himself stuck between a country that expects increasingly more from its government and a government that has a rapidly diminishing ability to deliver on those demands.

And that cold equation is going to loom large in the opening weeks of Mr. Obama’s administration, as immigration again becomes an active policy issue, one that has the volatile potency to derail his domestic agenda in areas such as healthcare and education.

With his transition underway he is already under immense pressure from Latino groups to immediately suspend upon taking office the most successful efforts to enforce immigration law at the border and in the workplace, an action that would be seen as a metaphorical green light south of the border and trigger fresh waves of immigrants seeking to make landfall in front of an anticipated amnesty.

Open-border activist groups will also move quickly to cash in their political chits with the new administration by demanding it move swiftly with Congress in passing a massive amnesty for illegal immigrants already here, an act that will dramatically increase the immediate pressure on government services by exploding the population of people who have legal access to them.

That strain on services and resources will only increase if Mr. Obama carries out his pledge to “reunite families” through immigration reform, which more plainly stated means that illegal immigrants will be able to bring their families into the United States following an amnesty.

Mr. Obama has also stated his support for increasing the number of visas that bring legal immigrants into the country, ostensibly to meet the skilled labor demands of industries that can’t seem to locate American workers in the growing unemployment lines.

In real world terms, if Mr. Obama decides to remake immigration policy according to current Democratic orthodoxy, millions more people may soon be competing for jobs and swamping taxpayer-funded services.

During the campaign, Mr. Obama was able to convince a majority of the American electorate that he was more of the pragmatist they needed than a liberal ideologue they should fear. By next summer, the American people will have a good indication whether that is true or not.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now