The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Late-season hurricane heads toward Gulf

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with Democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

  • Politics

    Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage

Home » News » Wire Columns

Thursday, November 20, 2008

EDITORIAL: Hillary Clinton to State?

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

CommissionerGordon

"It's more than a legal problem. There are ethical problems and appearance problems." Yeah, got to get just the right color for the pantsuits. Problems, you say? How do you define that?
Mark as offensive

Cornelius

Is Obama in charge? If so, why is there no change? Why are ALL the people he is bringing in old-style Democrats and former Clintonites? Where is the promised change? Is Obama in charge there?
Mark as offensive

soxconn

Hillary's appointment would just be substantiation of Obama's approach to "principled diplomacy" foreign policy. This will be a completely consensus driven policy with enforcement or compliance actions based on consensus. The same dysfunctional multilateralism of the Clinton era. Obama will only act toward compliance when he has the legal ability to share the blame as Clinton did in Kosovo and didn't have in the WTC bombing, the Khobar Towers bombing, the Embassy bombings, the USS Cole bombing and lets not forget about Black Hawk Down Somalia. This goes right along with Obama's obvious discomfort with the military, the receding military primacy predictions of the NIC and Barney Franks request to reduce the military budget by 25% right after Bush initiated his $700 billion bailout. Bottom line, we will use the U.N., legal excuses to act (or not) in behalf of the U.S. and pursuit of a Nobel peace prize as the foundation of our foreign policy. All brought to you by the HillBills.
Mark as offensive

JohnY

We need John Kerry for S of State, whose "nuanced" words and diplomacy will tame the wildest hearts no later than 31 January 2009. He'll be just a bit slower than Obama who will do the heavy work from the 20th to the 30'th. Eleven days ought to be enough for the team to get the world in order.
Mark as offensive

B472PIC

All through the campaign we were told that Obama is really smart. He was smart enough to not name Hillery as his VP (he would have needed a food taster). So why would he want her at State, where she could backstab him on policy? I've never heard the woman renounce her presidential ambitions. Of course, as a conservative, I could enjoy the show until it damaged the nation.
Mark as offensive

Orufus2008

Let's see. Obama said she would be a disaster as President. Obama said he was willing to sit down without conditions with leaders of foreign terrorist nations to "talk". Hillary said that would be totally wrong. Now, she is going to be setting up these talks, or doing the talks, or going off totally on her own without any Obama orders in hand. This is getting funnier and funnier. Obamaworshipers pay attention here. THE ONE is turning out to be a GIANT WAFFLE. Hillary Supporters..watch how OBAMA totally disrespects Hilliary...wasn't good enough to make her VP...because ole Joe Biden was BETTER ON FOREIGN POLICY....AND NOW, she is going to DIRECT THE INTERFACE WITH FOREIGN STATES!!!! Doesn't anyone she how it is ALL JUST POLITICS AS USUAL....Obama will not CHANGE Washington or ANYTHING. He is going to be what Ossama bin Laudin called him, the "house slave" and the Clintonistas and Pelosi and Reid are going to run the government...they are putting together the Clinton team as we speak....WELL, DIMS, you did not want 8 more years of Bush, but you are going to get 4 more years of Clinton....except everything is going to get done in secret this time. While the house-boy basks in White House glory, and the nation goes totally socialist.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. House OKs health reform bill
  5. Inside the Beltway
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama's unlearned lesson
  2. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  3. Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint
  4. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  5. House OKs health reform bill

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
More Top Stories »
  1. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  2. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
  3. Making fun of faith
  4. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  5. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.