- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Question of the Day
Paging Emily Post
Civility may be the prudent choice for conservatives at the moment.
“When is the right time to begin bashing Barack Obama? Everyone knows that within the next few months, the GOP must fight fiercely and effectively to derail major aspects of the new president’s disastrous left-wing agenda,” writes syndicated columnist Michael Medved.
“But conservatives will make a serious mistake if we begin the conflict before Obama even takes office. The most important factor to remember is that most Americans feel exhausted and weary from a seemingly endless two-year campaign and seriously crave a break from politics. Part of the general sense of relief and exultation on election night involved the shattering of an historic racial barrier, of course, but the public also felt gratitude because they sensed that a bitter partisan struggle had at long last lurched, coughed and sputtered to its climactic conclusion,” continued Mr. Medved, who also has a national talk-radio show.
“They not only welcomed the unifying, bipartisan tone of both Obama’s victory speech and John McCain’s singularly gracious concession, but embraced the idea that the nation might actually enjoy a needed respite from the daily attacks and ‘gotcha’ politics.”
“In that sense, the immediate insistence on demonizing the president-elect conveys precisely the wrong message. One of the reasons the GOP suffered major reverses across the country involved the perception that they practiced more divisive and angry politics than did the Obama-crats, with their fuzzy, feel-good message of hope and change.”
“First and foremost, Al Qaeda is an organization that thrives on propaganda,” writes Ilan Goldenberg, policy director of the National Security Network.
“But Al Qaeda’s narrative is now under siege, and it’s clearly uncertain about how to react. The election of the first African-American President, one with a Muslim father, flies in the face of this narrative. It shows America as an open and tolerant society — not the oppressive empire Al Qaeda would like to portray. In fact, the overwhelmingly positive international reaction to Obama’s election is proof of the threat Al Qaeda faces.”
Philip Klein of the American Spectator has that, and more.
“It could mean that al-Zawahri is concerned that the election of a black president who speaks in [conciliatory] tones could make it more difficult for Al Qaeda to demonize the U.S. among followers and potential recruits, and thus weaken the group’s standing in the Muslim world,” he writes. “Alternatively, it shows that no matter who is the president, Al Qaeda will see the U.S. as the enemy and is intent on continuing its war against Americans.”
Four years hence
Yes, yes. Perhaps the turks of the Republican Party will huddle in Iowa this weekend to ponder a new dream ticket that will wrest the White House from Democratic domination come 2012.
But from the you-never-know department, here’s this speculation from uber-political maven Lucianne Goldberg:
About the Author
- Inside the Beltway: Republican posse rides out to fire Harry Reid
- Third time the charm? Americans wish certain presidents had stayed beyond two terms
- The border crisis could prove a 'big boost' for Republicans as the midterms approach
- Inside the Beltway: Just a little media protection for the White House
- Some federal help for old American battlefields: $1.3 million to spruce them up
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Russia violating 1987 nuclear missile treaty
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq