The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    DAVIS: Yankee hater finds love for team

  • National

    Late-season hurricane heads toward Gulf

  • Politics

    Abortion a main issue in health debate

  • Sports

    Redskins still going south

  • World

    Ex-Soviet Union struggles with Democracy

  • Politics

    Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate

  • Politics

    Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage

Home » News » Business

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

EXCLUSIVE: Top oil lobbyist doubts reduced-use promises

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

Gene44

We currently have 100 coal burning power plants blocked by the environmental groups with lawsuits and they also oppose nuclear power plants. Thus the stage is set for America to have less electrical power available for companies, offices and homes. The complete system is loaded with no excess at present and the environmental groups want electric cars on the road now, but, where oh where will they get the electrical current to recharge the batteries? It takes time to build plants, create distribution lines, and the cost will be high. Still to power the above 100 million cars in America it will take thousands of plants generating 30 megabites of electricity to just handle the cars. Thus oil will be around for a while and it would be best to use American oil instead of oil from countries who are not so friendly to America.
Mark as offensive

kmooneyham

Another misunderstanding of intent...the real intent is to get Americans to move around less, especially on a daily basis. Those who live in the suburbs would be forced by a low-energy economy to move into cities to live, to be closer to work. This in turn creates a need for greater social services, thus creating a need for more government, and a greater demand for taxes. This IS socialism...being forced onto people, even if people do not realize it...one day Americans may wake up to find they are enslaved, but then again, if the socialists follow their master Marx's playbook, Americans might be unable to understand this is even happening...someone who reads this will say that I am off-base or flat out wrong...I say "Prove IT!" Not with Demo talking points...show me how I would be able to live in the 'burbs, go where I want, when I want, how I want, and pay less money to do so...but, I'm not going to hold my breath. In the meantime, I'll keep on clinging...
Mark as offensive

cedarhill

Anyone with any intelligence and not ignorant knows the AGW crowd is blowing smoke up everyone's skirt. Dr. Hanson, for whatever good science he ever did, is being shown to be either simply incompetent or intentionally manipulating data. The Mann hockey stick has been shown to be solely based on using either doubtful or simply wrong data sets. Even most Europeans think AGW is a crock. If green means nuclear dependence, I'm all for it. All the other greenie ideas to develop alternate energy are just loony socialist control mechanisms as prior posts have pointed out.
Mark as offensive

soxconn

Global warming has evolved to climate change because it may not be warming and without a foundation for Cap and Trade the Democrats will lose an acceptable tax. There is also the issue of national security. We don't need energy independence 10 years from now, we need it NOW. Russia is the only economic power in the world that is energy independent and they are making incursions into the western hemisphere and energy sources here. The U.S. could be independent within a few years but Congress continues to put constraints on our carbon energy production. Additionally those constraints will act against us if the global warming is a farce and we are entering a cooling period as some scientists predict. We could have developed carbon energy sources to offset the increase requirements in food and energy production, instead we are making contingencies against warming, relying on non-U.S. sources and strangling our own energy production. It will only take one event to bring down that house of cards, just like the economic crisis.
Mark as offensive

xpress_yourself

Too bad the left-wing illuminati keep promising the people they will help. Higher gas prices and no drilling, you read the article.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. Inside the Beltway
  5. House OKs health reform bill
More Top Stories »
  1. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  2. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Shared

  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  4. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
More Top Stories »
  1. Obama's unlearned lesson
  2. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  3. Obama's new world order
  4. The enemy at home
  5. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. Furious scramble for health reform support
  5. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence
More Top Stories »
  1. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  2. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
  3. Israelis unsure of U.S. support
  4. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  5. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Now that the House has passed the health reform bill, do you think the Senate will try to kill it?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    Samuels feeling better, hopeful

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.