The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion

LETTER TO EDITOR: Protect our friends

By | Saturday, October 11, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

As a former political prisoner in the ayatollah's jails, along with my husband and teenage daughter, and as a relative of several residents of Camp Ashraf in Iraq, I found Trita Parsi's suggestion that we need to defeat, rather than protect, the members of the People's Mujahedin of Iran (PMOI/MEK) despicable ("Deciding the fate of the Mujahedin," Solutions, Sunday Read, ).

His character assassination of these patriotic Iranians, many of them torture victims and former political prisoners, exposes my loved ones to even more risks.

Mr. Parsi is on a mission to tear apart the only organized opposition to Tehran's reign of terror, a quest he shares with the mullahs in Iran. According to the Wall Street Journal, the mullahs' regime has demanded both in public and through private channels, that the Bush administration break up the PMOI.

Mr. Parsi tries to justify his call for expulsion of Ashraf residents by claiming that those individuals who have returned to Iran have experienced no abuse. No wonder, considering that those individuals were later employed in the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence's campaign against the PMOI.

The residents of Ashraf, however, remain committed to their 40-year struggle to bring democracy to Iran. According to Amnesty International, they would face torture or other serious human rights violations in Iran.

The PMOI — the only opposition the ayatollahs see as a credible threat to their survival — was blacklisted by the Clinton administration in 1997 as a goodwill gesture to Tehran. In 2001, the United Kingdom, also kowtowing to Tehran, did the same. It, however, removed PMOI from the list following an emphatic ruling by an appeals court that said the PMOI is not involved in terrorism. It acknowledged the PMOI is dedicated to replacing the existing theocracy with a democratically elected, secular government in Iran.

In fact, the PMOI is the most popular Iranian opposition. On June 28, according to Agence France-Presse, more than 70,000 supporters of Iran's opposition [PMOI] protested near Paris.

In Iraq, on June 16, 2008, more than 3 million Iraqi Shi'ites supported the PMOI. Also U.S. commander Lt. Col. Julie S. Norman noted in 2006: "[PMOI] intelligence has been very helpful and in some circumstances has helped save the lives of [U.S.] soldiers" in Iraq.

It has been suggested that the expulsion of the PMOI could alter the regional balance of power and be a significant political and security gain for Iran. Tehran and its enablers in Washington such as Mr. Parsi, are bent on breaking up this strategic threat. The U.S. has a legal obligation — under international humanitarian law, the Geneva Convention, moral responsibility and national security — to thwart this ploy and continue to protect Camp Ashraf's residents for as long as U.S. forces are in Iraq.

ROBAB BARAEI Head of D.C. delegation U.S. Committee for Camp Ashraf Residents Washington

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Rep. Bob Filner, California Democrat, called on the State Department in May to remove the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran from its list of foreign terrorist organizations. Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Images

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  5. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  6. Israeli know-how
  7. Recession tea leaves 'misread'
  8. Chaos theory -- and practice
  9. Ouster a threat for Md. GOP chairman
  10. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.