- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
Legal group sues over polar-bear listing
Question of the Day
DENVER — The Pacific Legal Foundation filed a lawsuit Thursday challenging the Bush administration´s decision to list the polar bear as a threatened species, the latest salvo in the debate over global warming and its impact on Arctic wildlife.
Reed Hopper, the foundation´s lead attorney on the case, said the polar-bear listing under the Endangered Species Act was the first time “that a thriving species has been listed based entirely on speculative models forecasting future events.”
The Fish and Wildlife Service listed the polar bear as a threatened species in a May 14 decision based on U.S. Geological Survey reports predicting a loss in summer sea ice, considered critical habitat for the polar bear.
As critics pointed out, however, the polar bear itself has thrived in recent years, with its numbers rising over the last half-century to an estimated 25,000, the highest in recorded history.
“The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has declared the polar bear to be threatened solely because admittedly unverified and uncertain climate models predict a declining trend in Arctic sea ice, and not because of any current decline in polar-bear population,” said Mr. Hopper yesterday at a news conference.
The foundation´s lawsuit is the latest in a series of legal challenges to take on the polar-bear listing. Lawsuits have also been filed by the state of Alaska, the Center for Biological Diversity, the American Petroleum Institute, and the Safari Club.
At issue is whether the listing will become a proxy for a federal crackdown on petroleum emissions. Some scientists say that greenhouse gas emissions have caused global temperature increases, which have led to the melting of polar sea ice.
Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said at the time that the agency would take no steps to thwart climate change as a result of the listing, and that it would provide no additional protections other than those existing under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
But critics worry that listing could be the first step in a potentially devastating hit to the economy if the ruling leads to curbs on industry and transportation.
“In short, the polar is not threatened, but the listing itself threatens our already weakened economy,” Mr. Hopper said. “It simply invites attacks on our economy and American jobs based on speculative concerns that defy actual conditions on the ground.”
Fish and Wildlife spokesman Joshua Winchell said the agency was unable to comment on ongoing litigation.
Environmental groups, which have called on the agency to bolster the polar-bear listing by including restrictions on oil-and-gas development, denounced the lawsuits as the work of profit-hungry petroleum firms.
“We believe the science is clear that the polar bear deserves the full sweep of protections under the Endangered Species Act, and these petitions to overturn the listing are an attempt to put politics and Big Oil before science,” said Cindy Hoffman, spokeswoman for Defenders of Wildlife.
Joe Pouliot, director of climate and policy communications for the World Wildlife Fund, said the lawsuits move the issue in the wrong direction.
“We applaud the decision by the administration to list the polar bear and would like to see the decision strengthened,” Mr. Pouliot said. “We oppose any effort to weaken the protections the Secretary of the Interior and scientific community have said the bears´ survival depends on.”
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- EPA hears testimony on proposed carbon emissions rules
- Westerners call for oversight to combat federal land managers
- Protesters rally in Colorado to support Israel's fight with Hamas
Latest Blog Entries
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Islamic militants seize Benghazi as U.S. evacuates Libya
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors