The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Justices weigh juveniles' life without parole

  • National

    Leadership changes at the Times

  • National

    Hood suspect earlier came under FBI scrutiny

  • National

    PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil

  • World

    Envoy: Europe relies on U.S. shield

  • National

    'Anti-vaccine' attitude hampers H1N1 effort

  • Business

    Sinking dollar fuels new gold rush

Home » Opinion » Letters

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

LETTER TO EDITOR: Labor unions' contributions

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

anne4

Sen DeMint got it exactly right, and Mr. Maki's response is purposefully misleading. There is nothing unfair about expressing one's opinion about joining a union. It is grotesquely unfair, and anti-American, to require open ballots. Allowing the EFCA to go forward would be just one more example of corrupt politicians selling out to corrupt unions.
Mark as offensive

korvettekarl

Senator DeMint was 100% correct. Why would the union need to see your vote? So they can intimidate and harrass those who don't go along. I've seen it personally. It quite frankly makes a person despise the union even more. I was a member of IBEW for 22 of my 27 years at CENTEL/Sprint. The last five I woke up and kept my $900 a year and put in a savings account rather than give it to people who didn't care a wit about my wages, health or welfare, only about keeping thier position within the union.
Mark as offensive

HJ4646

Reid Maki said, "I recently heard author Barbara Ehrenreich speak, and she noted that when she was working at Wal-Mart as part of her research for her book "Nickel and Dimed," workers were not allowed to talk about unions on company property" Gee Mr. Maki, did it occur to you that Walmart employees are paid to work while they're at work? Did it not occur to you that Walmart has every right to determine what activities other than work, employees are allowed to engage in on the company's property? Since when did businesses lose their right to free speech, or the right to conduct their business, that they pay for, as they see fit? If the employees do not like the conditions at Walmart or any other open shop business, they have the right to seek other employment. By the way, did Ms. Ehrenreich disclose to Walmart that she was working there for the purpose of conducting research to use against the business? A spy? Walmart provided a job to this person in good faith and she repaid them by using information she gathered on their time against them to benefit the union. How French of her.
Mark as offensive

im2byteme

“In 1899,“ That was then, now is now! There was a time when the unions actually made a difference in helping workers get a fair shake, but don’t lose sight of the fact that it was always on the workers union dues dollar! The greed and special interests run rampant on the workers dollar today and they have no voice! I stand corrected if you thought it was OK for the unions to spend millions of worker union dues to promote a presidential candidate or a special interest? That spending could have increased workers medical benefits or reduced the premiums! It could have significantly increased workers strike benefits, God forbid that would be a necessity. There is a never-ending list of ways that money could have been better spent for the good of the worker, but wasn’t. “EFCA allows workers to express their desire to join a union by signing a card. Is there anything inherently unfair about that? The tone of your letter suggests you are very pro-union. It puts you out of the realm of undecided, about, what you want for an affiliation with a union. The current laws allow a worker to express their desire for a union to represent them. The huge difference is that under the EFCA there is no secret ballot. If workers want a union to represent them, it’s their business, and their right to privacy should be honored, and the same holds true for workers that don’t want a union. Currently, 30% signed cards is the authorization for an election. There is no clear definition in EFCA that specifies what percentage a majority is. That being said, who in their right mind would want one worker, in determining the future of more than three workers, if given the choice to speak for themselves? Mr. Maki, you tell me, is that fair? You addressed other issues that would take this comment to paperback length such as Barbara Ehrenreich And freedom of speech, but I choose to keep it shorter. Much of what we see in the workplace today, we brought on ourselves. Far too many workers in the workplace wouldn’t know work ethic if it came up and kissed them on the lips. Too many in top and middle management believe that good management style is something you can buy at Fantastic Sam’s. I have no leanings toward labor unions or corporate ideology. One is a parasite, and the other is tunnel vision to a bottom line respectively. The answer is not to give up our right to vote in the workplace, that truly is not fair, nor is it to let the government run our workplace. If the legislature went back to the drawing board and drew up legislation that really was a champion for the worker that would be another story. As it is written now it has already been bought and paid for. One of the EFCA’s biggest proponents in congress is a multi-millionaire that has taken part in as many union elections as she has lunar space flights.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  3. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
More Top Stories »
  1. Court refuses to halt sniper's execution
  2. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  3. House OKs health reform bill
  4. Annandale man killed in hit-and-run
  5. Inside the Beltway

Most Shared

  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Deer dies after leap into D.C. zoo lion exhibit
  3. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  4. PRUDEN: Fatal reluctance to see evil
  5. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
More Top Stories »
  1. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  2. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts
  3. Federal Reserve opposed as big bank savior by odd allies
  4. 'Fuzzy math' could drive health bill cost higher
  5. Choosing fantasy or facts

Most Commented

  1. House OKs health reform bill
  2. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  3. Army chief wary of backlash against Muslim soldiers
  4. Health bill faces roadblocks in Senate
  5. EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama, stay away from this wall
More Top Stories »
  1. Lieberman vows probe of Hood rampage
  2. Suspected Fort Hood shooter is awake, talking
  3. Obama: It's Senate's turn on health care
  4. EDITORIAL: President Obama causes more unemployment
  5. Defense nominee won't reveal potential conflicts

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    New Vatican constitution released

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    No interest in Johnson

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.