The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Sports

    KNOTT: Pollin honored as a D.C. treasure

  • Sports

    Jamison lights fire under Wizards

  • Politics

    Uninvited White House guests met Obama in line

  • Sports

    Wife aids Woods after SUV crash

  • National

    Volunteers for drug trials hard to find

  • Business

    Dubai debt crisis rocks U.S., Asia markets

  • World

    Piracy threatens fishermen in Yemen

Home » Opinion » Letters

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

LETTER TO EDITOR: Labor unions' contributions

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Videos
Subscribe to this story's comments

anne4

Sen DeMint got it exactly right, and Mr. Maki's response is purposefully misleading. There is nothing unfair about expressing one's opinion about joining a union. It is grotesquely unfair, and anti-American, to require open ballots. Allowing the EFCA to go forward would be just one more example of corrupt politicians selling out to corrupt unions.
Mark as offensive

korvettekarl

Senator DeMint was 100% correct. Why would the union need to see your vote? So they can intimidate and harrass those who don't go along. I've seen it personally. It quite frankly makes a person despise the union even more. I was a member of IBEW for 22 of my 27 years at CENTEL/Sprint. The last five I woke up and kept my $900 a year and put in a savings account rather than give it to people who didn't care a wit about my wages, health or welfare, only about keeping thier position within the union.
Mark as offensive

HJ4646

Reid Maki said, "I recently heard author Barbara Ehrenreich speak, and she noted that when she was working at Wal-Mart as part of her research for her book "Nickel and Dimed," workers were not allowed to talk about unions on company property" Gee Mr. Maki, did it occur to you that Walmart employees are paid to work while they're at work? Did it not occur to you that Walmart has every right to determine what activities other than work, employees are allowed to engage in on the company's property? Since when did businesses lose their right to free speech, or the right to conduct their business, that they pay for, as they see fit? If the employees do not like the conditions at Walmart or any other open shop business, they have the right to seek other employment. By the way, did Ms. Ehrenreich disclose to Walmart that she was working there for the purpose of conducting research to use against the business? A spy? Walmart provided a job to this person in good faith and she repaid them by using information she gathered on their time against them to benefit the union. How French of her.
Mark as offensive

im2byteme

“In 1899,“ That was then, now is now! There was a time when the unions actually made a difference in helping workers get a fair shake, but don’t lose sight of the fact that it was always on the workers union dues dollar! The greed and special interests run rampant on the workers dollar today and they have no voice! I stand corrected if you thought it was OK for the unions to spend millions of worker union dues to promote a presidential candidate or a special interest? That spending could have increased workers medical benefits or reduced the premiums! It could have significantly increased workers strike benefits, God forbid that would be a necessity. There is a never-ending list of ways that money could have been better spent for the good of the worker, but wasn’t. “EFCA allows workers to express their desire to join a union by signing a card. Is there anything inherently unfair about that? The tone of your letter suggests you are very pro-union. It puts you out of the realm of undecided, about, what you want for an affiliation with a union. The current laws allow a worker to express their desire for a union to represent them. The huge difference is that under the EFCA there is no secret ballot. If workers want a union to represent them, it’s their business, and their right to privacy should be honored, and the same holds true for workers that don’t want a union. Currently, 30% signed cards is the authorization for an election. There is no clear definition in EFCA that specifies what percentage a majority is. That being said, who in their right mind would want one worker, in determining the future of more than three workers, if given the choice to speak for themselves? Mr. Maki, you tell me, is that fair? You addressed other issues that would take this comment to paperback length such as Barbara Ehrenreich And freedom of speech, but I choose to keep it shorter. Much of what we see in the workplace today, we brought on ourselves. Far too many workers in the workplace wouldn’t know work ethic if it came up and kissed them on the lips. Too many in top and middle management believe that good management style is something you can buy at Fantastic Sam’s. I have no leanings toward labor unions or corporate ideology. One is a parasite, and the other is tunnel vision to a bottom line respectively. The answer is not to give up our right to vote in the workplace, that truly is not fair, nor is it to let the government run our workplace. If the legislature went back to the drawing board and drew up legislation that really was a champion for the worker that would be another story. As it is written now it has already been bought and paid for. One of the EFCA’s biggest proponents in congress is a multi-millionaire that has taken part in as many union elections as she has lunar space flights.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  4. Wife aids Woods after SUV crash
  5. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
More Top Stories »
  1. In tobacco-loving Virginia, bars give up the habit
  2. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure
  5. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  2. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  3. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  4. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  5. Finance mavens gloomy
More Top Stories »
  1. In tobacco-loving Virginia, bars give up the habit
  2. Fenty's approval in D.C. divided by race
  3. Drug lords finding safe haven in Bolivia
  4. Global Warmists exposed
  5. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God

Most Commented

  1. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  2. EDITORIAL: The global-cooling cover-up
  3. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
  4. PRUDEN: Trouble afoot for high priests
  5. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  2. Crashers probe may become criminal investigation
  3. HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure
  4. Obama taking emissions goal to summit
  5. 9/11 families sharply split on civilian court trials

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Are you planning to go shopping today?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Hall out, Rogers will start

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.