Pakistanis resist global favorite Obama

Pakistan does not have to worry until 21 January 2009 as Joe Biden has already let the cat out of the bag with his announcement that Obama will be tested within six months of taking office. He wants to be able to say that He not GW Bush got Bin Laden so people will rally behind his social agenda.

I don't think bin Laden or any of the other terrorists are very concerned about Obama. They see him and his fellow travelers for what they are.

Pakistan doesn't care for Obama because Obama stated that he would attack Pakistan. Obama wants to surrended to Al Qaeda in Iraq but increases forces in Afghanistan to attack Pakistan. On sunday in Seattle, Joe Biden said that he guarantees that within 6 months of an Obama presidency that there would be a international Crisis to test Obama. with McCain in office this would not be the case because the world knows McCain.

I wonder if Karl Rove has figured out a way for Pakistanis to vote here? At least we now know that many of the small donor to McCain's campaign are from Pakistan.

By: DTFrankel How very interesting. I guess ole McCain was right in the debate when he said that it was wrong & irresponsible (naive?) to telegraph a punch like that. Being somewhat of an ameture historian & afficianado of special operations, I've read enough books written by operators all the way back to the WW II to know that you don't say ANYTHING about what potential operations you might run in a country that is NOT overtly hostile, yet harboors elements of the enemy you happen to be fighting. Not to mention the fact that even if he WEREN'T to BOMB Pakistan, the chances that he would involve, in any covert op, the Pakistani intel service or the military in the spirit of "cooperation" would be disasterous. This is due to the fact the the Pakistani intel communtiy & military have been penetrated at all levels by al Qaeda & Taliban operatives who, as we all know, will sing like canaries to their handlers at the mere mention of an operation about to take place in Waziristan. Not very comforting at all when you're talking about a nuclear armed state. October 21, 2008 at 9:12 a.m. ----------- "Being somewhat of an ameture historian & afficianado of special operations," LOL - indeed you are avery amateur student. What's you take on starting a second war, before you have achieved total victory in the first? I'm betting you think it very smart.

Hey Glob; same war different front, not that difficult to grasp, unless you want/wanted defeat like most of the liberals want/ed and denial is the choice. We've heard the defeat chant for years, but it's not turning out that way.

By: Clarence Hey Glob; same war different front, not that difficult to grasp, unless you want/wanted defeat like most of the liberals want/ed and denial is the choice. We've heard the defeat chant for years, but it's not turning out that way. October 21, 2008 at 3:26 p.m. ------- Clare: You should read up on Operation Barbarossa - in your terms that would the same war, different front. How did it work out for your mentor? Love the line about Libs wanting defeat - didn't your mentor blame us Jews for the Red Army taking Berlin??