The Madonna divorce drama is not yet a week old, and already the diva may have broken rule No. 1 of having a civilized and amicable split: Don’t badmouth your spouse in front of the kids.
Last week, in front of tens of thousands of fans at a Boston concert, the diva introduced her song “Miles Away” with what was interpreted widely as a none-too-subtle gibe at her estranged husband - father of two children with her and stepfather to a third - Guy Ritchie: “This song is for the emotionally retarded. Maybe you know some people who fall into that category. I know I do.”
Despite widespread belief that Madonna’s barb was aimed at Mr. Ritchie, the star’s publicist, Liz Rosenberg, tells The Washington Times that Madonna “definitely was not talking about her husband” when she made those remarks.
Public vituperation of a spouse might afford a momentary sense of catharsis, but it carries with it serious risks to children - who may be emotionally damaged - and offending parents, who may unwittingly undermine their legal positions in child-custody or adoption proceedings.
“When a divorcing spouse makes public vulgar, insulting and humiliating comments about the other, children are devastated and tend to either compulsively go toward the attacked party to defend them or compulsively go toward the attacking parent so they won’t be identified negatively with the attacked parent,” said popular marriage and family therapist, author and radio host Laura Schlessinger, aka Dr. Laura, to The Washington Times when asked about Madonna’s comments.
“Either which way, children become emotionally fragmented, confused and distrustful … and that will be an issue for their whole lives when they are ready to establish relationships,” she says.
Actor Alec Baldwin, who recently had his own celebrity divorce drama, may know how Mr. Ritchie feels. In his new book, “A Promise to Ourselves: A Journey Through Fatherhood and Divorce,” Mr. Baldwin devotes an entire chapter to parental alienation syndrome, in which one parent - usually the custodial mother - badmouths the noncustodial parent - usually the father - to such an extent that it affects the father’s relationship with his child.
“A mother that is attempting to alienate a child from the child’s father sends signals to the child,” he writes. “These signals are not only that nearly any love for or loyalty toward the father is an act of betrayal, but also that the child is significantly responsible for the mother’s emotional well-being. The child knows, instinctively, that it has little choice but to please the custodial parent. The child’s very life becomes, in a sense, about pleasing the alienating parent.”
The British tabloid press is ready for a soap opera.
Madonna has hired Fiona Shackleton, who represented singer Paul McCartney in his expensive divorce from Heather Mills. Mr. Ritchie has retained Lady Helen Ward, the lawyer who won Britain’s biggest divorce settlement (more than 120 million pounds, or almost $203.6 million, for the ex-wife of an insurance magnate).
Both Lady Ward and Ms. Shackleton declined, through assistants, to comment for this article.
U.K. press reports have said that the couple, whose worth is estimated to be upward of 300 million British pounds (almost $509 million) may not make headlines fighting over the money. Those sources said Mr. Ritchie likely will settle for a lump sum and a division of their properties.
What probably will be the juicer - and sadder - battle will be for the futures of the children: Lourdes, 12, whose father is personal trainer Carlos Leon; Rocco, 8; and David Banda, 3, whom Madonna and her husband adopted from Malawi two years ago.
If Madonna seeks to take the children to live in the United States, it could get particularly ugly.
“Since they have been raised and educated in the U.K., she will need their father’s agreement to this, in default of which she will need to apply to the courts,” British attorney Joanna Grandfield told the Independent, a British newspaper. “However, unless he has parental responsibility for Lourdes, he will not be able to influence decisions as to where she will live or be schooled in the way that he can for Rocco and Madonna and his adopted son, David. This exemplifies the difficulties faced by many stepparents on the breakdown of their marriages, be they pop superstars or ordinary men on the street.”
Washington divorce attorney Glenn C. Lewis says making a remark like Madonna did onstage in Boston was a mistake that could come back to haunt her in the divorce proceedings.
“She and her attorneys might live to regret that,” says Mr. Lewis, who is not advising Madonna.
“What she said might not have been done with malice,” Mr. Lewis says, “but she is bypassing her brain by going right from her heart to her mouth. That is never good.”
Celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred says most divorcing spouses feel rage and disappointment and often say things they later regret. However, the sense of entitlement that comes with celebrity ramps up the platform a bit.
“There is always pent-up frustration,” she says, “but why say something onstage? Because she can. [Celebrities] are used to being able to say and do whatever they want and not think about the consequences. That is unwise for a number of reasons. Children at some point may hear it, and that can be disturbing and upsetting.”
Legally, words can cost, too, Ms. Allred says.
“Courts do not like derogatory statements,” she says. “They can be used in a custody dispute. The other party can say, ’I am the good parent; I haven’t said anything.’ Even though venting might feel good at the time, it can have legal consequences.”
Acrimony also might call attention to Madonna if she tries to adopt another child. Various newspapers have reported that Madonna and Mr. Ritchie were at odds over whether to adopt again. Madonna wants to adopt a 3-year-old girl from Malawi; Mr. Ritchie reportedly was less than enthusiastic.
A divorce proceeding can change adoption plans, even when the potential parents are rich and famous, Mr. Lewis says.
“The agencies and courts want to know the status of the adoptive parents,” he says. “If they started the adoption as a married couple, an intact family [but] she is now single, then that changes things.”
Please read our comment policy before commenting.