THOMAS: Obama's smoking audio

RE: Electing Barack Obama president of the United States would be a roll of loaded dice. According to who YOU? Get the tin foil off your head.

How does Mr. Obama credibly take the oath of office to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" when he thinks it impedes his socialist agenda? ============== The same way GW Bush did when he wanted to have the use of Torture justified as national policy - find a friendly lawyer? The same way GW Bush did when he wanted to get rid of Habeaus Corpus - find a friendly lawyer? The same way GW Bush did when he wanted to restrict the 4th. Amendment - find a friendly lawyer?

Obambi, Is A Chi-town Marxist Rat.

MG: Get your head out of your butt and read the article. You sound like one of those idiots that drank cool aid for Jim Jones. If you think Nobama is the messiah vote for him. Sorry bout that, but people who are so easily deceived confirms Americans are easily fooled by a glib politician.

I am very interested in seeing/hearing this interview. Do you have a link, maybe, yes, no?

GlobalEye has WaTimes duty again for Obama's ACORN BlogCorp? It amazes me how leftists become completely unhinged, still, about President Bush. It must be drag for those with Bush Derangement Syndrome like GlobalEye to realize that Bush has a higher approval rating than the Congress his Messiah Obama belongs to. Way higher. Thomas is right, Obama is socialist AND a shyster lawyer, with a creepy dose of 'get wh!tey' thrown in. It's going to be such a pleasure watching him lose.

Maybe Obama is a Socialist. But Socialism in a pure form is a pretty solid theory. But we live in the real world and there is no such thing as pure, right? So would a socialist illuminati like Obama just totally ruin our country? Maybe. But i do know i am up for some new ideas and what if Obama isn't really a socialist but just likes a few socialist ideas, maybe something different would be good. And i think that there are enough checks and balances in our system that Obama couldn't really do away with our democracy and get away with it. could he? bottom line, i think we need more change than McCain is offering. The lesser of two evils.. which one is it.

GlobalEye is just using Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radical's : Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame. He is cherry picking one sentence to neutralize the entire column. The hidden issue of the column is the fact that the mainstream media's role in as the "fourth estate" has evolved from a role of framer of political issues to role of bias toward and protection of Obama. They are preparing the way for the transition to socialism. They have created a hyperreality, corrupted their role in first amendment and noone really seems to care.

MG and his ilk keep fabricating rights-violations regarding GW Bush, but they have nothing to back it up. Had Bush made comments like these that Obama made, it might be different. But Bush defended America's freedoms, Obama wants to take them away--- and nothing MG can come up with in the way of hard evidence can change that. It's really quite laughable about the fictions the left has conjured up about Bush, one of our greatest presidents EVER. Anyway, he won TWICE and isn't running this time. Obama is, and his own words will deep six him, figuratively speaking of course.

Road Warrior: Could Osama Obama really do away with our democracy and get away with it? I don't know, but I really don't want to see him try. I do think we need change, not just a change in administrations, but a change to the system and the way things are done in Washington. If Obama is elected we will get a change back to the Carter administration. Pinwheel Nancy and Dingy Harry will finally have the change they need to tell us what is best for us. You'll have Madeline All-dull and Warren, Shoot-em-in-the shoulder, Christopher back in government. Yes, that's change from what we have now but is it progress? With McCain, there is some hope of fundamental change. He will not just be a tool for the Republicans and will not go along with "the way things are done". He has shown that he has an independent inclination and doesn't mind breaking with convention. That's one of the few things I like about him. It really comes down to this. Do you want just another Democrat administration or do you want at least the possibility of real change?

This belief by Obama that the non-elected Supreme Court and the federal court system should be used as a means to "de facto" rewrite the Constitution is truly dangerous stuff. It strikes right at the essence of America's reason for being. Our forefathers started this nation because we had unelected outsiders, the British Empire, trying to tax and run our society. They wouldn't stand for it. Now, we face the latent prospect of an imperial judiciary, unrestrained by the legislative or executive branches, imposing by decree measures that the people never had a voice in. When and if things get to that that point, the federal judiciary forfeits its legitimacy and rights to sole interpretation of the Constitution. The Congress and the President must act against judicial excesses. If they do not, then, under our federal structure, this duty falls to the individual states to the protect the rights and property of their citizens, using the necessary measures to do so.

I am really afraid of the consequences of an Obama election to the Presidency. Thomas is right with his comparison. Most people do not know what they are voting for with Obama. God help us all if he wins!

There is PLENTY wrong with Socialism. No society has prospered or remained free under socialist government. If you think France is free, you should try to make up a new word there. I do not agree that President Bush is one of the greatest presidents, but he did a good job with the lousy hand he was dealt -- mostly by Clinton. He cannot be called great because he is not a conservative, and did not uphold conservative ideals when given the chance. He gave only grudging half-hearted support to protecting our borders from illegal aliens, and then pushed this unconstitutional, ill-advised, Socialist, bail-out and power grab of our financial sector. Do you think the Dems are going to give that back? If so, I have a Chicago candidate to sell you. Mr. Thomas, once again, has made an excellent argument for conservatism and against traitorous socialism. Well done.

I couldn't get the link to open up but unless this is the full interview, it has been edited to make it sound like spread the wealth but it is actually talking about education if you listen to the whole interview. I do think his intention is to "spread the wealth" but this tape is not adequate evidence.

The real damning statements are that the Founding Fathers had it all wrong, and the Constitution is a "flawed document." He also said that the ultra-liberal Warren Supreme Court was not very liberal because they let the Constitution get in their way. Obama is an adherent to Liberation Theology, as he was taught by his mentor, Jeremiah Wright. He believes the white man is to blame for all evils, and will attempt to redistribute the wealth of the predominantly white middle and upper-middle class to the predominantly minority lower classes. That is what the tape is revealing, when heard in relation to his other statements. If that sounds like the America you want, then you should vote for the Communist Organizer. Otherwise, vote for the man who has proven repeatedly that he loves this country more than his life.