The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Sports

    Offense erupts in Caps' victory

  • National

    KUHNHENN: 10% jobless rate is Obama's troubling world

  • World

    Joint forces probe NATO air strike

  • National

    Fla. shooting suspect 'mentally ill'

  • Business

    Parents buying homes for kids at college

  • Politics

    Looking to 2010, GOP focuses on fiscal restraint

  • National

    Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate

Home » Opinion

Friday, October 31, 2008

ANDRES: The changing impact of higher education

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Voters' choices should be cause for concern to Republicans

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Opinion Stories

  • FRIST: Saving children's lives
  • LETTER TO EDITOR: Maryland's future is green
  • TELLA: Politics and the Fed
  • EDITORIAL: Congressional Motors

By Gary Andres

OP-ED:

Since modern polling began in the 1940s, surveys have demonstrated educational attainment shapes political behavior. Higher levels of schooling correlate with increased turnout, interest in politics and efforts to persuade others how to vote. It also influences partisan attachments and vote choice.

The interaction of education's impact on politics along with an increase in the number of voters with advanced schooling is changing elections in America.

Surveys during the middle part of the 20th century found those with higher levels of education sided with Republicans, while less-educated Americans aligned with Democrats. But over the last 20 years or so, this pattern has begun to shift. Compared to the 1950-80 period, Republicans have improved their results with less-educated voters and Democrats have gained among those with college degrees. Ron Brownstein agrees and calls this pattern "class inversion." Writing in National Journal recently, he argues: "In the middle decades of the 20th century when economic class served as the principal glue for the two parties' coalitions, Democratic presidential nominees Adlai Stevenson, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson and Jimmy Carter all ran at least 13 percentage points better among white voters without a college education than among whites with college or post-graduate degrees, according to the University of Michigan's American National Election Studies [ANES], an exhaustive post-election poll."

The graphic below plotting the presidential choice of voters with college degrees, including those with graduate degrees, underscores this point. With the exception of 1964, which was an aberrational election, it shows a broad Republican advantage until about 1992 that shrinks considerably in recent elections.

Looking at the differences between white men and white women with college degrees is particularly striking. Democrats now poll better with higher-educated voters in general compared to 20 years ago. But the most dramatic GOP deficit emerges among women with college degrees. According to National Journal's analysis of presidential exit polls, between 1992 and 2004, white college-educated men still preferred Republicans by an average of about 17 points - less than during the 1950-80 period, but still a significant Republican advantage. During the same period, Democrats actually outperformed Republicans among white college-educated women by about 5 points.

Mr. Brownstein argues the rise of social issues during the last 20 years accounts for these differences. College-educated women may be sympathetic to conservative economic arguments but are more liberal on social issues such as abortion, gay marriage and gun control. These cross-pressures do not exist among men at the same levels, which might account for the divergent patterns. Research by Princeton University political scientist Larry Bartels also suggests higher-income and better-educated voters care more about social issues (making them lean toward Democrats) than lower-income/education voters. Bread-and-butter issues concern voters across class lines, Bartels argues, while upper-class Americans say they care more about social issues as well.

This trend among college-educated voters - and particularly women - creates electoral challenges for Republicans and opportunities for Democrats for two reasons. First, the college-educated proportion of the electorate is growing. College graduates represented about 12 percent of the electorate in the 1950s and 1960s, but grew to 36 percent in 2004. Women with college degrees increased from 11 percent to 34 percent during the same period, according to the ANES. The percent of the electorate represented by women is also rising, increasing from 51 percent in the 1950s to more than 54 percent of the electorate in 2004 - and heading higher based on this year's forecasts.

Republican strategists and elected officials interested in growing their party post-2008 must address these trends, while Democrats will consider ways to exploit them.

Gary Andres is vice chairman of Dutko Worldwide.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Sniper's ex-wife speaks out on abuse
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. Inside the Beltway
  5. Armored troop carriers called unsafe for duty
More Top Stories »
  1. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  2. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  3. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  4. Can the 10th Amendment save us?
  5. 60 Plus leader: Senior 'tsunami' coming

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. Parents buying homes for kids at college
  3. Aborted fetus cells used in beauty creams
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Making fun of faith
More Top Stories »
  1. Sunshine vitamin stirs new debate
  2. Obama's new world order
  3. EDITORIAL: The grass roots keep growing
  4. NSA surveillance -- of you?
  5. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute

Most Commented

  1. Army: Suspect said 'Allahu Akbar!' before shooting
  2. Muslims stunned by Fort Hood shooting
  3. Furious scramble for health reform support
  4. 'Gentle' Army psychiatrist displayed worrisome signs
  5. House OKs health reform bill
More Top Stories »
  1. EXCLUSIVE: Rare virus poses new threat to troops
  2. 13 killed at Texas army base; psychiatrist accused
  3. PRUDEN: Corpse sits up, gets nice salute
  4. EDITORIAL: Too scared to recognize terrorism
  5. Obama praises those who ended Fort Hood violence

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • POTUS Notes

    New Dem talking point on Obama approval doesn't wash

  • The Back Story

    12 arrested at Pelosi's office

  • Belief Blog

    Washington goes Greek this week

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Redskins 360

    He Said, She Said Week 9

  • Tara's Two Cents

    On their way to summer vacation..

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.