- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
LOVERRO: Embrace FedEx for all its foibles
Question of the Day
The Washington Redskins last week played their final game against the Cowboys at Texas Stadium. Next season, the Cowboys move into their new stadium, where fans will pay personal seat license fees from $16,000 to as much as $150,000 for the right to buy the most expensive seats in the building.
On Sunday, the Redskins play the Philadelphia Eagles at Lincoln Financial Field, which opened in 2003 and where fans paid personal seat license fees from $2,000 to $4,000 - a bargain now.
And in 2010, the Redskins will play the New York Giants in their new stadium, where fans will pay between $1,000 and $20,000 in personal seat license fees. More than half of those will be priced at $5,000 - again, merely for the right to buy season tickets.
That would leave the Redskins as the only team in the NFC East where fans don’t have to pay for personal seat licenses.
So you’d better stop complaining about the high-priced tickets, the traffic, the parking, the sound system, the video board and everything else that has made FedEx Field a less-than-ideal fan experience. You’d better give the hated stadium a warm embrace and love it.
And you’d better stop wishing for the team to move back to the District into a new stadium. It will never be RFK in 1982 again.
FedEx Field, which opened in 1997, by 2010 will be the oldest stadium in the division and, without personal seat licenses, the biggest bargain in the division.
How long do you think Dan Snyder is going to live with that?
Snyder owns FedEx Field, so he reaps the rewards of that ownership. But you have to believe the Giants and Cowboys could gain a competitive edge financially over Washington.
With the opening of those two new stadiums, you can expect talk to heat up about the District making a deal with Snyder for a new stadium in the city - especially one with a retractable roof that would allow Washington to host a Super Bowl, which, like the Olympics, seems to be some sort of municipal validation that escapes me.
Earlier this year, it was reported that District Mayor Adrian Fenty was pushing for a written proposal to Snyder to bring the Redskins back to the city.
It will be a complicated process. Don’t expect the District to pay for it, as the city was forced to lure baseball here. No, Snyder will have to pay the freight for a new stadium. Still, expect to see enough benefits tied to it to make it worth him digging into his own pocket - perhaps something connected to the development rights along the Anacostia near RFK Stadium, the likely site of a new stadium - to Snyder.
Also complicating the issue is the deal Jack Kent Cooke made with the state of Maryland for infrastructure costs in connection with the construction of FedEx Field - a 30-year lease.
Last year, Redskins general counsel Dave Donovan said the club is legally bound to FedEx Field until 2027 because of that agreement.
“We don’t want to leave,” Donovan said. “We’re really happy and don’t have any other options because we’re bound to the lease. It was written in a way to make sure that we play football there for 30 years.”
About the Author
- LOVERRO: These are Bruce Allen's Washington Redskins now
- LOVERRO: CBS Sports leaves broadcasters hanging in Redskins name debate
- LOVERRO: Who are the men behind D.C. 2024 curtain?
- LOVERRO: Ian Desmond could follow Jeter model in D.C.
- LOVERRO: Red Klotz an unquestioned winner despite 14,000 losses
Latest Blog Entries
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Cutler wins endorsement from gun control group
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq