The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Latest Headlines

Plans for King memorial get approval

Panel rejects security posts

By Brett Zongker, ASSOCIATED PRESS | Friday, September 5, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Construction on the Martin Luther King Jr. National Memorial drew near Thursday when a panel overseeing architecture in the nation's capital approved final building plans.

The 8-2 vote by the National Capital Planning Commission is one of the last steps in a lengthy approval process for the $120 million project. However, the panel rejected a National Park Service recommendation for security bollards - short metal posts - that would help block a truck bomb from reaching the site.

The agency had identified a security threat by extremist groups "spouting racist ideologies," which would work against King's legacy, said Park Service Associate Regional Director Peter May. Details were discussed behind closed doors, with the panel later deciding against the barricades.

"When we begin to hide behind walls and barriers and gates," that goes against King's ideals, said commission Chairman John V. Cogbill III. "I think it would be an embarrassment to the family and to the memory of Dr. King."

Memorial designers also said barriers would have taken away from their concept, which follows King's ideals for nonviolence, openness and inclusion.

Ed Jackson Jr., executive architect of the project, said approval was still needed from the Commission on Fine Arts, which criticized an earlier design. He plans to present final changes to the panel on Sept. 18.

The commission had said the depiction of King was too "confrontational" and asked to see a new model.

Mr. Jackson said they have made artistic changes to the King sculpture but not as a response to critics.

"Confrontational and sincere may be two sides of the same coin," Mr. Jackson said. "I don't believe it is confrontational. What I do believe is it has garnered the endorsement of [King's] children."

Once the arts panel signs off, the memorial foundation can apply to the Park Service for a permit to build on the Mall. The foundation hopes to do that by November before congressional permission for the project expires. Otherwise, the group would have to ask for an extension.

The memorial will be located on the Tidal Basin between the Jefferson and Lincoln memorials, surrounded by cherry trees. It will be the first memorial honoring a black leader on the Mall and the first major tribute to King outside Atlanta, where he was born in 1929.

About $100 million has been raised for the effort, and the group must raise an additional $20 million to complete the project.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  5. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  6. Israeli know-how
  7. Recession tea leaves 'misread'
  8. Chaos theory -- and practice
  9. Young Cons a YouTube surprise hit
  10. Ouster a threat for Md. GOP chairman

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.