MALKIN: Conservative female abuse

More spittle for Cons to lick up. Ms.hatelibs selling some of her wonder spittle for the gullible Cons to swill down. Drink it up and feel empowered by hate. Nothing more liberating in the world then being given permission to hate. Lick it up. Feel the power.

The truth sure gets the libs upset. It's OK to demonize Judge Thomas, and any one that doesn't fit the libs mantra. God help us if these socialist, big government types ever get in real power. Thought control. Shades of 1984 ( for you libs, it was a book).

kc, I've seen several of your posts. Good thing we have freedom of speech, eh?

Yes, freedom of speech is wonderful. So is thinking. Try it sometime and see clearly the wreck people like Malkin have made of my party. That would be the Republican party. Polluted by propaganda artists and people who hate libs more then they love the country. Let those who have eyes see, and ears hear. It didn't used to be this way. Now it is the way of life and Constitution is dying in front of us because of it. So go back to reading this filth and the filth the Limbaughs propagate. It's still a free country. But for how long? When will you too be labeled a liberal? These are not conservatives but radicals

The liberals are nothing more than socialists and communists...as such they use the methods espoused and codified by their villainous forefather, Karl Marx. Smear tactics, saying that someone has "sold-out" if they don't agree with the voting block that libs have put them in, its what Karl told them to do...a failed ideology from the most evil man of the modern world...they hate it when you refuse to be one of the next millions of victims...

Michelle is, as usual, right on. The existence of successful minorities and women in a system supposedly designed to prevent it is a mortal threat to the left’s narrative. If they lose the two key pillars of racism and sexism, they lose power which is all they really want anyway. So the party of tolerance can exhibit none for those who don't toe the line. It’s a two-fer. One, we witness the hypocrisy of people whose ideology dies if they allow their constituencies to achieve success and two, we get to watch them respond by using the very hate speech they supposedly condemn. It’s an endless amusement.

1. Ms. Palin has rushed to make political capital from her Down's syndrome child. However, as Alaskan writer and herself a mother of a Down's syndrome daughter, and Democrat, Mary Mullen points out, all the programmes onwhich Alaskan parents of special needs children depend to assist them in helping their children maximize their potential were put in place under Democrat administrations and were opposed tooth and nail by the Republicans. 2. The political wedding of her pregnant 17 year old daughter is nothing less than child-abuse in the cause of political respectability. To pressurize this pregnant child into marriage at this age is to ignore the statistical fact that 95% of such marriages fail with sad personal consequences to all concerned. This child was impregnated when she was 16 and in most advanced societies "Levi" would not be preparing for marriage. He would be preparing his defence to charges of statutory rape. 3. Imagine what a field day Ms. Malkin and the other attack-dogs of the extreme right-wing press would have had if Chelsea Clinton had got herself pregnant at 16 rather than exercsing restraint and growing up a credit to herself and her parents. 4. Is feckless teenage parenting and the equally feckless failure of parents to inculcate decent values in their teenage children now off the agenda for conservative pundits?

Equating liberals with socialist and communists betrays a total ignorance of what constitutes a socialist. All socialist societies going back several centuries (yes, societies pre-dating Marx can be classified as socialist. e.g. Aztec society was clearly socialist in its structures.) have 3 qualities. 1. Command control economy. 2. No private property. 3. State controlled religion. Anyone who thinks the Democratic party seeks any of these 3 goals is a first rate moron, being led around by the nose by people who profit from them. Anyone who has actually studied the subject would know better.

Pete Murray mentions Mary Mullen's article which was published last week in the Irish times... a very good read, written by a 'real Alaskan' who happens to live in Ireland now. Either Google it or go to this link to be further enlightened 'how it is' from an Alaskan point of view: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2008/0905/1220544890619.html?via=mr