Lack of written agreement snags N. Korea talks

By Nicholas Kralev (Contact) | Tuesday, September 9, 2008

• Print
• [-][+] Font Size
• E-Mail Alerts
• Tell a Friend
• Got a Question?
• You Report
• Click-2-Listen

EXCLUSIVE:

The Bush administration may have contributed to the latest impasse with North Korea by failing to get a written agreement that links Pyongyang's removal from the U.S. terrorist blacklist to a plan to verify the country's nuclear disarmament.

After insisting for weeks that North Korea "knows what it needs to do" to be taken off the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism, U.S. officials said that they "communicated" the precondition verbally.

"We communicated to them that we attach great importance to a verification mechanism," said State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, adding that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had stated that publicly as well.

• U.S. intelligence: Kim Jong Il may be ill

"We will have to know about the prospects for verifying this declaration, because the president's made very clear we are going to take that into account before we make any decisions," Miss Rice told reporters during a summit of Asian leaders in Singapore on July 24.

President Bush announced on June 26 his intention to remove the North from the terrorist blacklist and to lift economic sanctions, hours after Pyongyang submitted an overdue account of its nuclear activities. North Korea expected action after 45 days - the minimum allowed for congressional notification - but after that period had passed, North Korea stayed on the blacklist, sparking a furious reaction from Pyongyang.

Last week, the North Koreans said they were trying to restart operations at their main nuclear reactor at Yongbyon, which has been largely disabled as part of a six-nation deal reached last year. The Bush administration dismissed what it called "moving of equipment" as a "ploy" to win more concessions.

The administration has proposed a nuclear-verification plan committing the North to providing broad access to staff and facilities, as well as to other forms of cooperation.

As The Washington Times reported in July, the proposed nuclear plan does not include a timeline for completing the verification process.

Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?