The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > World

Pakistan pursing diplomacy, not a fight

Wants halt to U.S. border raids

By Paul Alexander ASSOCIATED PRESS | Sunday, September 14, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan | Pakistan says it will pursue diplomacy, not conflict, to persuade Washington to halt raids into its territory in search of Islamic militants, calling the U.S. strategy counterproductive.

The comments made Friday night and Saturday by two top officials seemed to indicate that the government, trying to avoid an outright confrontation with its ally and financial supporter, has decided to ease public rhetoric in hopes that quiet talks will convince Washington that the attacks are only inflaming sentiment against both countries' leadership.

The furor over a recent rash of attacks in Pakistan's tribal areas near the Afghan border escalated after reports emerged Thursday that President Bush secretly approved more aggressive cross-border operations in July as part of a strategy to fight the resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan.

The main opposition party suggested Friday that Pakistan should consider dropping out of the war on terror if the policy continues.

Since Aug. 13, there have been at least seven reported missile strikes as well as a raid by helicopter-borne U.S. commandos that Pakistani officials say killed 15 civilians in tribally governed territory where the Islamabad government has little control. The border region is considered a likely hiding place for al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri.

A group of tribal elders representing about a half-million people in the North Waziristan area, where most of the missile attacks have occurred, threatened Saturday to join forces with Taliban militants in Afghanistan.

"If America doesn't stop attacks in tribal areas, we will prepare a lashkar [army] to attack U.S. forces in Afghanistan," chief tribal elder Malik Nasrullah told a news conference in Miran Shah, the area's largest city. "We will also seek support from the tribal elders in Afghanistan to fight jointly against America."

Protests against the U.S. incursions, each drawing about 50 people, were held Saturday in Karachi, Lahore and Quetta by the Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf party of cricket star-turned-politician Imran Khan. Some carried placards reading "Bush worst example of human rights violations."

The government and military have issued stiff protests to Washington, although the criticism appeared to be mostly rhetoric aimed at soothing domestic anger since Pakistan really has few options to influence U.S. policy short of opening fire on allied forces or cutting off relations.

Defense Minister Ahmad Mukhtar repeated Pakistan's contention that it is doing all it can to fight militancy and is suffering as a result, with more than 1,000 security forces killed since the country allied itself with Washington in its war on terror after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the United States.

Pakistan's military said Saturday it killed at least 72 militants and lost eight forces in three days of fighting near the Afghan border, where Taliban and al Qaeda militants are thought to be hiding.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Associated Press
Supporters of Pakistan's opposition Tehrik-e-Insaf party hold a banner reading: "We condemn the killing of innocent people in U.S. strikes in Pakistani tribal areas" during a rally Saturday in Lahore, Pakistan. But the government said it is backing off suggestions that it might confront U.S. troops making raids into its territory in search of Islamic militants.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  6. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  8. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws

Most Shared

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  6. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  7. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  10. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.