- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
Debate watchers are not swayed
MEMPHIS, Tenn. | Sen. Barack Obama may have lost some support when he said people earning $250,000 or more were rich, but Friday’s first presidential debate changed few minds among a mixed group of voters.
“I’m completely conflicted, I really have no idea what I’m going to do,” Anne Tipton, a Memphis attorney, said before the 90-minute debate started.
“If I went into the voting booth tomorrow I’d just have to stay in there,” she said.
Mike Scholl, an attorney who hosted the debate watch party at his home, did not like it when the Democratic presidential nominee defined wealthy people.
“I know a lot of guys who make that much as small business owners like me, and I wouldn’t consider them rich,” he said. “It’s not rich by any stretch of the imagination once you pay taxes.”
But he still can’t make up his mind.
“I felt like it was sort of half and half, it didn’t really help me,” he said.
Joelle Bradshaw was already an Obama supporter, and organized the party at Mr. Scholl’s home in the Southbluff neighborhood here with the philosophy: “All viewpoints are welcome.”
Her posting on the BarackObama.com site for debate-watch parties encouraged supporters of both Mr. Obama and Republican nominee Sen. John McCain as well as undecided voters, saying: “Let’s mix it up!”
Melissa Lucy arrived a McCain supporter and the debate “strengthened my resolve even further.”
“He’s 100 percent confident that he can lead this nation, and much more presidential than Obama ever is,” she said. “Maybe eight years ago in a pre-Bush United States maybe Obama would have been OK, but right now we need someone who can do the job.”
The forum sealed Marty McAfee’s vote for Mr. Obama, even though he supported Mr. McCain in 2000.
“He used to seem like his own man, but the more I see McCain the less I think of him. It’s really sad to see he’s sold out and become just another politician,” Mr. McAfee said.
“Now he seems to be really owned by those pollsters. How many times did he say, ‘Senator Obama doesn’t understand? He said it in every answer, no matter what the question,” Mr. McAfee said. “He was clearly coached.”
About the Author
Christina Bellantoni is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times in Washington, D.C., a post she took after covering the 2008 Democratic presidential campaigns. She has been with The Times since 2003, covering state and Congressional politics before moving to national political beat for the 2008 campaign. Bellantoni, a San Jose native, graduated from UC Berkeley with ...
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- HURT: Wilson and Obama ... 100 years apart, but so alike
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.