A high-stakes game of chicken between labor and business is unfolding in Colorado over four pro-union ballot measures and a right-to-work proposal, all of which are scheduled to appear on the November ballot.
Labor leaders, desperate to kill Amendment 47, the right-to-work measure, qualified four measures for the ballot last month that nearly everyone agrees would cripple the state’s economy. Union officials have agreed to remove the four so-called “poison pills” from the ballot if Jonathan Coors, a third-generation heir to the brewing fortune, removes Amendment 47.
Problem solved, except that Mr. Coors, 28, refuses to budge or even discuss sinking the amendment, which would forbid making union membership or dues-paying a condition of employment.
Now the state’s top Democratic political leaders, led by Gov. Bill Ritter Jr., are negotiating with labor officials to pull the four measures by the Oct. 2 deadline. They’re not above quid pro quo: The latest option calls for businesses to contribute between $2 million and $4 million to the union coalition’s campaign to defeat Amendment 47 in exchange for the proposals’ removal.
The entire spectacle has mesmerized the state’s political and business sectors, which anxiously await daily updates on the talks. It also has opened up debate over whether Mr. Ritter is doing the right thing by moving to protect the state’s economy - or buying more trouble by giving in to union blackmail.
As far as Jon Caldara is concerned, it’s the latter.
“You shouldn’t negotiate with terrorists,” said Mr. Caldara, head of the free-market Independence Institute in Golden, Colo.
“Unfortunately, business can be very shortsighted,” he said. “What’s to stop [the unions] from doing this next year? Or the next?”
Be that as it may, Colorado can’t take the chance that even one of the four poison-pill measures may pass, said Joe Blake, president of the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce and one of the key figures involved in the talks.
“It’s a tragic miscalculation for Colorado on the part of everyone involved,” Mr. Blake said. “You can clearly see the impact of these amendments on the economy and the state - if any one of them passes, it’s going to make it impossible for us to recruit and maintain businesses here in Colorado.”
At the same time, it’s easy to see why the four measures would prove attractive to voters. The first, Amendment 53, known as the Colorado Corporate Fraud Initiative, would make executives criminally liable if they fail to report fraudulent activity at their corporations.
“In Colorado, we’ve paid the price for greedy CEOs and companies who break the rules to get ahead,” says a statement by Protect Colorado’s Future, the labor coalition promoting the ballot measures. “According to the FBI, white-collar fraud costs Colorado taxpayers billions of dollars every year. But too often, corporate criminals end up walking free, while taxpayers are left holding the bag.”
Amendment 55 would require employers to show “just cause” before they fire employees, essentially barring “at-will” employment, the current standard.
Amendment 56 would require businesses with more than 20 employees to provide comprehensive health care insurance for employees and dependents.View Entire Story
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at email@example.com.
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A round eye’s guide into the Chinese world.
This column will cover anything that has anything remotely to do with the game of baseball, from the game itself to mid-summer trades to offseason moves.
Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Doloff and friends.
World's Ugliest Dog Contest
Spelling Bee finale
Marines train Afghan soldiers
Rolling Thunder 2013
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal