- The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 7, 2009


The D.C. Council overwhelmingly voted Tuesday in favor of legislation recognizing gay marriages from other states — a move city lawmakers lauded as a step toward legalizing such marriages in the city.

“This is the march toward human rights and equality,” said Council member David A. Catania, at-large independent. “And that march is coming here.”

If signed into law, the bill will allow gay D.C. couples to marry in one of four states that allow such marriages, then return to the District and have the marriage recognized under city law.

The 13-member council gave preliminary approval to the bill on the same day Vermont became the fourth state to legalize same-sex unions. The Vermont legislature voted to override the governor’s veto and allow gay marriages.

The D.C. legislation faces final approval by the council next month, then it must be reviewed by Congress, which has final say over most city laws.

The three other states that approve same-sex marriages are Connecticut, Massachusetts and Iowa.

Mr. Catania, who is gay, said he expected no opposition from Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, Democrat.

“Today was the right day to move forward on this issue given what has happened” in Vermont, Mr. Catania also said.

Fenty spokeswoman Leslie Kershaw said the mayor is reviewing the legislation.

The D.C. Council voted 12-0 in favor of the amendment to a bill introduced by Phil Mendelson, at-large Democrat.

Members also approved legislation that recognizes relationships that are similar to domestic partnerships in the District and have all “the rights and responsibilities of marriage” in another jurisdiction.

Another provision in the legislation allows the mayor to certify as domestic partnerships relationships in the District that fall short of marriage.

Council member Jim Graham, who is gay, said the council did the “right thing” and that he was not concerned by the possibility that Congress could intervene.

“My job here to vote my conscience,” said Mr. Graham, Ward One Democrat. “They should do their job as they see fit.”

Story Continues →