- The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Democrats in Congress are taking a swipe at credit card issuers and their increasingly creative reasons for raising fees on strapped consumers, setting up a well-financed duel over how to crack down on purported abuses.

Striking the right balance between getting credit moving again and protecting consumers who depend on it is a long and complex process and nowhere near complete. But lawmakers were hoping to advance consumer-friendly legislation before they head home for Easter at the end of the week and face their constituents - 12.5 million of whom are out of work.

“Right before this break coming up, I thought it was a good time to try to deal with it, get it done,” said Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat.

His panel led the way Tuesday by narrowly voting to send the full Senate a bill that would ban some of the many reasons credit card issuers raise interest rates and fees on consumers, in turn raising the hackles of industry advocates who say such limits would ultimately cost consumers more money.

“Making this credit available is a very risky business and the committee’s action today will unfortunately make it harder, not easier, for banks to continue doing so,” said American Bankers Association’s Kenneth J. Clayton.

Democrats rattle off examples of some in the industry that have exploited the needy: The college student or elderly consumer who was offered and accepted lines of credit they plainly could not afford; the economically viable consumer stunned by bigger-than-expected monthly payments, inflated under an obscurely written agreement or for hard-to-understand reasons.

Mr. Dodd’s bill - similar to the House measure to be considered Wednesday - would force the industry to comply this year with some of the same rules approved by the Federal Reserve and slated to take effect in 2010.

Mr. Dodd’s proposal, approved by the panel 12-11, would bar “double-cycle” billing, when a card issuer computes interest charges on outstanding balances from more than one billing cycle. It also would ban “universal default,” the practice of raising a cardholder’s interest rates when that consumer has problems paying other creditors. And it would prevent card issuers from changing the terms of a contract as long as the card holder pays on time.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide