Probe of FDIC contract urged by watchdog group

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a public watchdog group, urged the Inspector General’s Office at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. on Monday to investigate a contract that the agency awarded to a real estate firm headed by the husband of Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

CREW sent the letter in response to a report last Tuesday in The Washington Times, which disclosed that the CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE), the firm headed by Ms. Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum, received a lucrative FDIC contract in November to sell foreclosed real estate from failed banks at compensation rates higher than industry norms.

In January, Ms. Feinstein, California Democrat, introduced legislation sought by the agency that would have routed $25 billion in taxpayer funds to the FDIC for a program to help prevent home mortgage foreclosures.

CREW is asking that Inspector General Jon T. Rymer launch an investigation into how the contract was awarded and the genesis of its terms, which the watchdog group said “reward CBRE at a much higher rate than is typical for these contracts.”

• Click here to view the letter. (PDF)

“Senator Feinstein would welcome a review from the Inspector General, because there is no conflict of interest or wrongdoing,” Feinstein spokesman Gil Duran said in response to the CREW letter.

Mr. Duran, spokesmen for the FDIC and Mr. Blum’s firm have told The Times that there was no connection between the contract and the legislation. Mr. Duran and a spokesman for the Blum firm also said that the couple were not aware of the CBRE’s interest in the contract until after it was awarded.

The FDIC and CBRE have defended the terms of the contract as being fair and reasonable and said it was awarded by professional staffers after a competitive process.

“In these times of great economic turmoil, we must be able to trust that the government is getting the best value for our taxpayer dollars,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW. “The Inspector General should investigate the terms and genesis of this contract and let the American people know if this is a fair deal or not.”

CBRE spokesman Robert McGrath said the statements by CREW “betray a lack of understanding of our company and the FDIC assignment.

“We have been retained to serve as asset manager in overseeing and managing a process to manage, value and dispose of hundreds of properties across the U.S.,” he said. “We are highly qualified to assist the FDIC … and our pricing is competitive for a highly complex assignment with significant reporting requirements.”

Mr. McGrath described Mr. Blum as the “nonexecutive chairman of our company,” saying he plays no operational role and was unaware the firm was pursuing the FDIC contract. He said the contract at most will account for “significantly less ” than 1 percent of the firm’s revenues, which last year were $5 billion.

Mr. Rymer said, “We have received the letter and we have no comment at this time.”

The Times reported that real estate experts with experience in selling foreclosed properties found the terms of the contract “sweet.” For example, they found it unusual that CBRE was allowed to collect incentive fees of up to 2 percent on top of their normal commissions if they sell the properties within six months.

Cynthia Kenner, a Colorado real estate agent who specializes in selling foreclosed properties, said, “From everything I know about it, it is a very sweet deal and went to somebody who is less than qualified in dealing with foreclosed residential properties. Their expertise is in commercial real estate.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks