- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
The ad wars of August
The escalating war to block President Obama’s hostile takeover of our health care system has moved to a wider battlefield of TV ads, Internet videos and town-hall meetings where his opponents may have the advantage.
With Congress on vacation through Labor Day, the grass-roots ad wars of August against Mr. Obama’s government-run medical care scheme is being fought out on a more level playing field where Republicans have shown they’re better at this kind of combat than their Democratic rivals. Think Hillarycare, for example, an incomprehensible, Rube Goldberg budget buster that Democrats never brought up for a vote in the House and Senate.
The protagonist in many of the Republican Party’s ad videos will be Mr. Obama himself, as critics use his own words to show what health care would be like if he and liberal Democrats get their way.
One of the most stinging Internet ads was sent out this week by House Republican Leader John A. Boehner’s office, titled “I’m Not a Doctor, But I Play One on TV.”
In it, an actor is seen reciting those words before the video switches to Mr. Obama suggesting to a woman at a town-hall health care meeting that maybe her 100-year-old mother would have been better off without the expensive pacemaker she had implanted to alleviate her heart trouble.
The video shows Mr. Obama during an ABC News broadcast at the White House, saying that families need better information about their medical choices so that they don’t have to accept “additional tests or additional drugs that the evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve care.”
Then Mr. Obama adds, ruefully, “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller.”
Back to the doctor, and then back to Mr. Obama, this time at a prime-time news conference, suggesting that doctors will needlessly take out a child’s tonsils just to make more money.
The video truncated his remark, but here’s what Mr. Obama said: “… you come in and you’ve got a bad sore throat, or your child has a bad sore throat or has repeated sore throats, the doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, you know what, I make a lot more money if I take this kid’s tonsils out.”
Mr. Obama has used this kind of cynical technique in other speeches that attack the health care industry in a political attempt to raise fears that polls show the American people do not share. In this case, he is planting the idea in people’s minds that greedy doctors are more interested in making money than in their patient’s well-being. He has repeatedly attacked the insurance industry and the medical profession when polls show Americans are overwhelmingly satisfied with their insurance coverage and their doctors.
Back to the video and the actor repeating his “I’m not a doctor” mantra to underscore that they should distrust anyone dispensing medical advice who is not a doctor, then back to Mr. Obama, who is at it again. This time, he is talking about “a blue pill and a red pill,” suggesting the blue generic pill is the better choice because it was “half the price of the red pill.” Of course, that is not always true. In some cases, the generic can be less effective.
The video ends showing a prescription pad signed by Mr. Obama.
By using a bit of humor in a deadly serious subject, the video deftly underscores one of Obamacare’s biggest flaws: bureaucratic federal rules and regulations that will dictate what medical options you will have under a government-run system. It may not include the pacemaker that seniors need or it may mandate generic drugs that aren’t right for your loved ones. Maybe the rules will suggest that you take a painkiller instead.
Mr. Obama has hammered away at this point, most recently at his last news conference when he said he wanted Americans to get the best care, just not the most expensive. What is he suggesting? That his health care plan may not cover certain costly, lifesaving procedures or treatments? It sounds that way and smacks of rationing or worse.
Republicans will be running a lot of ads like this throughout August to throw the Democrats on the defensive and get more Americans thinking that maybe this $1 trillion-plus spending scheme isn’t the way to improve our health care system or make it more affordable.
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Glenn Beck takes on Hollywood with big movie production plans
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee