EDITORIAL: Selling out private coverage

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

The specter of nationalized health care is making strange bedfellows. Democrats have attacked medical insurance and pharmaceutical companies as evil for wanting to stop the government takeover of health care. But at the same time, Democrats are working closely with these industries to push the initiative forward. In exchange for favorable treatment in the plan, health care companies are financing a massive ad campaign to support government care.

Fox News reports that pharmaceutical companies are prepared to spend at least $150 million, and possibly as much as $200 million, to promote the changes President Obama wants. Private insurance companies, which funded ads that helped defeat President Clinton’s takeover of the health care industry in 1993 and 1994, have launched ads supporting Mr. Obama this time around. These campaigns will dwarf any opposition efforts to highlight the dangers of the proposed reforms, according to Fox.

Despite the largesse, Democratic rhetoric gives no quarter to the drug and insurance companies. When polls started showing that support for the president’s plan was dropping, Democrats needed a boogeyman, even if it was their allies. Referring to insurance companies, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed at the end of July that, “Of course they’ve been immoral all along in how they have treated the people that they insure. They are the villains.”

In his July 22 press conference, Mr. Obama warned: “You know, there had been reports just over the last couple of days of insurance companies making record profits. Right now, at the time when everybody’s getting hammered, they’re making record profits, and premiums are going up.”

The demonized companies can take the heat because the eventual payoff will be huge. Democrats are proposing that these industries run the new government health care system. This serves as an unwelcome reminder that some big businesses don’t care about capitalism; they only care about their profits. If getting in bed with government guarantees cash flow, that is fine with them.

The consumer is lost amidst all the horse trading. The government and large firms might get what they want, but individuals will not. Most Americans just want to keep the coverage they already have. That option is not on the table in the smoky back room.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts