The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Sanford faces 37 charges on state ethics laws

  • Politics

    Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate

  • National

    Green energy stimulus growing few jobs

  • National

    9/11 defendants eye platform

  • Entertainment

    Jackson wins 4 American Music Awards

  • Politics

    Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard

  • Sports

    Redskins' loss like a kick in the gut

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Friday, August 21, 2009

EDITORIAL: Sugar high

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

Price sweetening sours the U.S. economy

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  • EDITORIAL: Another stimulus
  • EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  • EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin

By THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Americans love sugar so much that we protect the domestic industry by limiting sugar imports. This works like a jawbreaker in the U.S. economy.

By keeping sugar prices artificially high, import limits result in food manufacturing job losses and higher prices for everything from hamburger rolls to sweet treats. Sugar industry protectionism is estimated to cost U.S. families as much as $2 billion annually, according to the Cato Institute. Domestic food processors -- including General Mills, Hershey and Kraft -- are pressing the U.S. Department of Agriculture to ease import limits to stave off a possible sugar shortage.

Although the department predicted last week that U.S. sugar supplies will drop 43 percent by September 2010, 1.25 million short tons of raw sugar sit in U.S. warehouses, according to the agency. The American Sugar Alliance, a sugar industry trade group, argues this is enough to meet foreseeable domestic demand for the sort of refined sugar that goes into products like cookies.

This doesn't mean food producers are wrong in arguing that the department should increase the level of tariff-free imports when needed, as it did in 2006 and 2008, but import politics can be a sticky business. Big Sugar is a powerful lobby protected by lawmakers from sugar beet and cane producing states in the South and upper Plains.

Higher prices from import limits may protect sugar industry jobs, but protectionism is a detriment to the economy at large. According to a 2006 International Trade Administration study, each sugar growing and harvesting job saved by higher U.S. sugar prices results in almost three confectionary manufacturing job losses.

World sugar prices are at a 28-year high primarily because of lessened exports from Brazil -- which is using lots of sugar cane to produce ethanol -- and expectations that India's yield will not meet demand.

Higher costs, whether artificially inflated or not, are passed on to consumers. This undermines the buying power of the U.S. dollar. Protectionist policy may be sweet for big sugar, but it is hard for the rest of us to chew on.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  2. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  5. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
  3. Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
  4. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
  5. Report: ACORN mismanaged grant money

Most Shared

  1. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  2. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  3. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  4. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  5. Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  2. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  3. VMI faces probe into sexism
  4. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  5. Constitutionally, the next time

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  3. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  4. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  5. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin
More Top Stories »
  1. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  2. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
  3. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  4. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  5. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Mason returns

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.