- The Washington Times - Saturday, August 29, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, according to the Sept. 11 commission report, was the mastermind of the Oct. 12, 2000, attack on the U.S.S. Cole that killed 17 U.S. sailors.

Al-Nashiri was also the target of an “unauthorized” CIA interrogation technique (that had not been legally vetted by the Justice Department) that is described in a May 7, 2004, CIA inspector general’s report that was partially declassified by the Obama administration this week.

CIA officers blew smoke in al-Nashiri’s face, according to the report, and they used cigars.

The IG’s office described this smoke-blowing as one of several “unauthorized or undocumented techniques” it discovered had been used in isolated incidents by CIA employees interrogating high-level al Qaeda terrorists.

“An Agency [redacted phrase] interrogator admitted that, in December 2002, he and another [redacted phrase] smoked cigars and blew cigar smoke in al-Nashiri’s face during the interrogation,” said the IG report.

The IG, however, was unable to clearly establish that the smoke-blowing was intended to force al-Nashiri to cough up what he knew about al Qaeda’s plans.

“The interrogator claimed they did this to ‘cover the stench’ in the room and to help keep the interrogators alert late at night,” said the IG report. “This interrogator said he would not do this again based on ‘perceived criticism.’ Another agency interrogator admitted that he also smoked cigars during two sessions with al-Nashiri to mask the stench in the room. He claimed he did not deliberately force smoke into al-Nashiri’s face.” The interrogators learned their lesson: Don’t blow smoke at terrorists.

In a more serious incident, a CIA interrogator reported that some unspecified interrogators told Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, that they would kill his children if America were attacked again.

“An experienced agency interrogator reported that the [redacted] interrogators threatened Khalid Shaykh Muhammad [redacted],” said the IG report. “According to this interrogator, the [redacted] interrogators said to Khalid Shaykh Muhammad that if anything else happens in the United States, ‘We’re going to kill your children.’ According to the interrogator, one of the [redacted] interrogators said [redacted].”

An obvious question: What is the word or phrase in this passage that has been redacted in three instances immediately before the word “interrogators”? All we know for sure is that the government thinks it should remain secret.

Presumably there’s a good reason: national security.

Having survived his exposure to second-hand smoke, al-Nashiri was exposed to the most serious unauthorized interrogation technique documented by the IG.

“Sometime between 28 December 2002 and 1 January 2003, the debriefer used an unloaded semi-automatic handgun as a prop to frighten al-Nashiri into disclosing information,” said the IG report. “After discussing this plan with [redacted] the debriefer entered the cell where al-Nashiri sat shackled and racked the handgun once or twice close to al-Nashiri’s head.

“On what was probably the same day,” the report continued, “the debriefer used a power drill to frighten al-Nashiri. With [redacted] consent, the debriefer entered the detainee’s cell and revved the drill while the detainee stood naked and hooded. The debriefer did not touch al-Nashiri with the power drill.”

Now, this truly idiotic behavior led the CIA’s inspector general to conscientiously refer the case to the Criminal Division of the Justice Department — six years ago, immediately after it happened. The Justice Department declined to prosecute.

Other reported instances in which CIA interrogators used unauthorized techniques did not merit a separate IG investigation, according to the report. “These included the making of threats, blowing cigar smoke, employing certain stress positions, the use of a stiff brush on a detainee and stepping on a detainee’s ankle shackles,” the report said. “For all of the instances, the allegations were disputed or too ambiguous to reach any authoritative determination regarding the facts.”

In the end, the IG dodged a definitive judgment on the productive value of the enhanced interrogation techniques that the Justice Department did approve for use by the CIA, saying that the “effectiveness of particular interrogation techniques in eliciting information that might not otherwise have been obtained cannot be so easily measured.”

But CIA interrogations of detainees, according to the report, did uncover plots against the United States, including plans to “loosen spikes in an attempt to derail a train,” “blow up several gas stations to create panic and havoc,” “hijack and fly an airplane into the tallest building in California in a west coast [sic] version of the World Trade Center attack” and “cut the lines of suspension bridges in New York in an effort to make them collapse.”

In the eight years since Sept. 11, 2001, al Qaeda has not managed to strike America again. As a reward for the CIA’s part in this success, President Obama has now stripped the agency of its lead role in questioning terrorists, and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has named a special prosecutor to investigate its interrogation practices.

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSnews.com.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide