Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Germany and France slow to pledge troops for Afghanistan

President Barack Obama speaks about the war in Afghanistan at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)President Barack Obama speaks about the war in Afghanistan at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Washington’s NATO and other allies will send at least 5,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, but it may take President Obama months to reach his goal of up to 7,000 new allied forces, U.S. and European officials said Wednesday.

Conspicuously absent from recent pledges have been Germany and France, whose governments’ domestic political challenges complicate any war decisions. Still, diplomats said, both countries could boost their military presence after an international conference on Afghanistan in London in late January.

“In 2010, the non-U.S. members of this mission will send at least 5,000 more soldiers to this operation, and probably a few thousand more,” NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said in Brussels. “This is not just America’s war. What is happening in Afghanistan poses a clear and present danger to the citizens of all our countries.”

Mr. Rasmussen was not specific, but in the past month, nine countries - only four of them NATO members - have pledged a total of up to 4,000 more troops. The largest pledges came from Britain, Poland, South Korea and the former Soviet republic of Georgia.

It was not clear from where the difference of more than 1,000 troops would come, but Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said during a Senate hearing that he had received “private commitments” of 1,800 to 2,000 troops this week.

Mr. Gates, who said the Obama administration hopes for up to 7,000 troops from allies, refused to name the countries in question, saying they have “very delicate coalition governments” and will make public announcements when they deem appropriate.

“The will is there, but the political capacity to deliver has been a challenge,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Our hope is that what the president has decided will change the political dynamic.”

The secretary said the administration’s goal is to have about 150,000 U.S. and foreign troops and about 200,000 Afghan forces in Afghanistan for its strategy to work. The Afghan army currently has fewer than 100,000 members. The United States has about 68,000 troops and will add 30,000 more, with allies making up the difference.

European officials said the silence from Berlin and Paris, both of which welcomed Mr. Obama’s announcement Tuesday, should not be viewed as the final word from the two capitals.

“No one has said ‘no’ just yet,” one British official said. “It may be weeks, even months, until we know what the final tally will look like.”

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said she plans to discuss further military contributions with NATO allies when she meets Friday with fellow foreign ministers at the alliance’s headquarters in Brussels.

“There will be a number of announcements over the next days and weeks,” Mrs. Clinton told the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Diplomats said Mr. Obama’s intention to begin withdrawing some forces in July 2011 could help other governments commit more troops, because they can go to their publics with a specific deadline - even if their own soldiers do not return home at the beginning of the pullout.

“It is absolutely crucial for our strategy that the Afghans start to take control of security as soon as possible,” British Prime Minister Gordon Brown told the House of Commons in London.

Mr. Brown pledged 500 more troops last month and decided to keep in place another 700 who went to Afghanistan to provide security for the country’s presidential election in August and had been scheduled to leave after the vote. Those 1,200 will bring Britain’s total to 9,500, the British official said.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Author
Nicholas  Kralev

Nicholas Kralev

Nicholas Kralev is The Washington Times’ diplomatic correspondent. His travels around the world with four secretaries of state — Hillary Rodham Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright — as well as his other reporting overseas trips inspired his new weekly column, “On the Fly.” He is a former writer for the weekend edition of the Financial Times and ...

You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Rights So Divine

          Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.