Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Stimulus plan stimulating enough?

ASSOCIATED PRESS
President Obama, seen here Wednesday with JetBlue CEO David Barger, says his economic-stimulus package would give about $10 to $20 more in weekly paychecks to America's workers in efforts to pull the nation out of the economic crisis he describes as "devastating." Republicans say their alternative would be more cost-effective.ASSOCIATED PRESS President Obama, seen here Wednesday with JetBlue CEO David Barger, says his economic-stimulus package would give about $10 to $20 more in weekly paychecks to America’s workers in efforts to pull the nation out of the economic crisis he describes as “devastating.” Republicans say their alternative would be more cost-effective.

President Obama’s tax cuts for America’s workers in the economic-stimulus bill making its way through Congress will mean about $10 to $20 more in weekly paychecks, though economists are divided over whether that will have any impact on the recession.

Mr. Obama’s “making work pay” tax credit will mean an additional $500 for individual taxpayers and $1,000 for families over a year. In terms of its impact in a depressed $14 trillion economy, some economists say it will have little, if any, effect on consumer spending, while others say the increase in pay would be significant among lower-income workers.

The House Republican stimulus proposal, on the other hand, called for cutting the two lowest income-tax rates from 10 percent to 5 percent and from 15 percent to 10 percent. Republicans estimate the new rates would reduce taxes for married couples filing jointly by up to $3,200. Supporters say the Republican tax cuts would produce twice as many jobs as the Democrats’ bill at half the cost.

But as the Democrats’ House bill headed to the Senate, opinions differed sharply over its effect on taxpayers and the troubled economy.

“It has virtually no bang for the buck because it doesn’t affect incentives for working, investing and things that actually make the economy go,” said economist J.D. Foster at the Heritage Foundation.

“Even if you get all of the money at once in a government check or over a quarter of the year, it will have the same effect on the economy — zero,” Mr. Foster said.

But economist Gary Burtless at the Brookings Institution said the impact of the House-passed tax cut, especially for two-earner families, to a large extent depends upon how it is perceived by workers.

“If you are a single person, you are going to get about $10 a week more in your paycheck, and married couples will get about $20 a week,” Mr. Burtless said.

“Since we are talking about a tax credit of 6.2 percent of earned income, you are going to hit that $500 if you’ve earned a little over $8,000 a year, so it means anyone who earns minimum wage will get the full $500. Almost everybody is going to get the full tax credit,” he said.

“But the impact on taxpayers should be larger if this is perceived as permanent, that they are going to have $1,000 more in their pay that they get to keep, then they would have an incentive to consume a bigger percentage of it. And that’s the point of the tax cut, to boost consumer spending,” he said.

“The $100,000 question for many people is how they perceive it,” he added.

But Republicans leaders in Congress say these worker tax cuts, which will total $145 billion over two years, are only a relatively small part of the $819 billion stimulus bill, most of which is made up of spending on federal agencies, infrastructure and public works projects, plus aid to the states and safety-net programs.

Rep. Tom Price, leader of the House’s conservative Republican caucus, says he is certain of two things: It will pass Congress, but it will fail to jump-start the economy.

The three-term Georgia congressman and orthopedic surgeon, a rising star in the House’s GOP leadership ranks as the chairman of the Republican Study Committee, called Mr. Obama’s plan, which his group opposes, “the non-stimulus package” because, he said, every time such spending programs have been tried, they have failed to boost economic growth.

“The problem is, it won’t work, and so the American people will be watching at some point in the future to say, ‘Well, what happened?’ ” he said in an interview with The Washington Times.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Author
Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is the chief political correspondent for The Washington Times, the author of five books and a nationally syndicated columnist. His twice-weekly United Feature Syndicate column appears in newspapers across the country, including The Washington Times. He received the Warren Brookes Award For Excellence In Journalism in 1995 and in that same year was the host and co-writer of ...
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential candidates, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, right, and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum argue a point during a presidential debate Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2012, in Mesa, Ariz. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

    Rivals target Santorum in debate

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** Newt Gingrich (Associated Press)

    Gingrich campaign warned 2nd time for financial dealings

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • FILE - This May 24, 2010 file photo show the exterior of Solyndra Inc. in Fremont, Calif. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

    Bonuses given after raises at Solyndra

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Champion's Heart

          A wife, mother of three and world waterskiing champion looks at the world through the eyes of her faith.

          Tango of Mind and Emotion

          Notes for nurturing and understanding mental-emotional health.

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.