The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    VAN CLEAVE: A Thanksgiving message from Russia's spy agency

  • National

    HOLMES: Behind Obama's overseas allure

  • World

    Thailand seeks U.S. help battling insurgents

  • Politics

    Obama taking emissions goal to summit

  • Business

    Retailers bank on post-holiday Black Friday

  • World

    Corruption stain puts Pakistan leader at risk

  • Politics

    Courage the turkey escapes Obama's plate

Home » News » Wire Columns

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

FEIN: War is a public affair

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS
President Obama is considering whether to overturn a Pentagon ban on media taking pictures of flag-draped coffins of U.S. troops returning from battlefields. This undated Defense Department photo was taken aboard a cargo plane in Dover, Del., and obtained by memoryhole.org.

More Wire Columns Stories

  • ROMper ROOM: Learn to spell with Wolverine
  • VAULTS: Risk pays off for 'Nun's Story'
  • ROMper ROOM: Review of 'Challenge Me: Math Workout'
  • ROMper ROOM: Review of Gold's Gym Workout

By Bruce Fein

COMMENTARY:

At present, the Pentagon prohibits news coverage of coffins arriving at Dover Air Force Base from Iraq and Afghanistan. The military knows that pictures are worth a thousand words.

They are key elements of political debate - especially in matters of war and peace. Think of Nick Ut's 1972 photo of 9-year-old Kim Phuc in South Vietnam, running naked down a highway after her village was bombarded with napalm, or Pablo Picasso's Spanish Civil War painting "Guernica."

News coverage of coffins of dead American soldiers returning from Iraq or Afghanistan should be part of public discourse over whether those twin wars should be continued - which is not self-evident. The Constitution authorizes a "common defense" to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." It nowhere hints that sacrificing Americans in a quest to extend the blessings of liberty to Iraqis, Afghans, or other foreigners would be a legitimate constitutional enterprise. Neither is "defense" a synonym for offensive warfare in anticipation of a possible attack. That would end any constitutional limits on war, and squander the lives of soldiers as senselessly as the British Charge of the Light Brigade during the Crimean War.

Abraham Lincoln elaborated: "Allow the president to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion ... and you allow him to make war at pleasure.... If today he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him? You may say to him, 'I see no probability of the British invading us'; but he will say to you, 'Be silent: I see it, if you don't.' "

As regards military tactics, the idea that Iraq or Afghanistan would launch an attack the United States if U.S. and NATO troops were withdrawn - even if their governments were replaced by Islamic extremists - is fatuous. What is more plausible is that they might harbor international terrorist groups, like al Qaeda. But other countries already give aid and comfort to international terrorists without provoking U.S. military intervention, for example, Iran, Syria or North Korea.

If the latter countries are insufficiently threatening to justify war, why does Iraq or Afghanistan satisfy a war threshold? In any event, the public needs more not less information about the Iraq and Afghan wars to decide whether they should be prolonged. News photos of coffins returning from the two wars would further that objective.

Accordingly, Democratic President Barack Obama should endorse North Carolina Republican Rep. Walter Jones' bill to lift the Pentagon's current prohibition. He should not await a Pentagon internal review. A 2003 national poll by the New York Times and CBS found that by a 62-27 percent margin, respondents believed photographs of the military honor guard receiving coffins at Dover, Del., should be permitted.

Maintaining the news ban to protect family privacy is unconvincing. The coffins do not bear the names of the deceased. They do not lend themselves to commercial exploitation. Moreover, the time has long since passed when war might have been considered a private affair like Achilles battling Hector in Homer's "Illiad."

As Clausewitz wrote in "On War," "War is nothing more than the continuation of [international] politics by other means." Even with an all-volunteer armed forces, the Iraq and Afghan wars affect the entire nation. Hundreds of billions have already been spent on the twin wars, which has aggravated the nation's economic plight. Moreover, arguably the wars have made Americans less safe by provoking widespread resentments abroad by the intentional or unintentional killing of civilians and triggering instinctive human hostility towards an occupying power. A recent BBC and ABC News survey revealed that although 90 percent of Afghanis oppose the Taliban, less than 50 percent hold favorable views of the United States, a vertical plunge from a year ago, and that 25 percent believe attacks on U.S. troops can be justified.

In sum, all Americans have a stake in making the decisions whether to continue the Iraq and Afghan wars turn on the most complete information and balancing of risks and benefits. No private individual should be permitted to throw a spanner into the democratic process by shielding a military coffin from news coverage.

In Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia (1980), the United States Supreme Court recognized a First Amendment right of public access to trials. Writing for a plurality, Chief Justice Warren Burger explained that the Amendment guarantees freedom to communicate about the functioning of government; and, "it would be difficult to single out any aspect of government of higher concern and importance to the people than the manner in which criminal trials are conducted." The chief justice overlooked war.

Bruce Fein is a constitutional lawyer with Bruce Fein & Associates, Inc. and author of "Constitutional Peril: The Life and Death Struggle for our Constitution and Democracy."

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  4. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  5. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
More Top Stories »
  1. D.C. sports icon, Wizards owner Pollin dies
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. List of W.H. state dinner guests
  4. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. EDITORIAL: The duty of a nation to obey God
  4. Grade-schooler unearths fossil at dinosaur park
  5. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
  2. The global-cooling cover-up
  3. The United Socialist States of America
  4. VAN CLEAVE: A Thanksgiving message from Russia's spy agency
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
  3. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  4. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  5. Ky. hanging, ruled a suicide, leaves bloggers at loss for words
More Top Stories »
  1. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  3. A-listers, fundraisers at W.H. state dinner
  4. Obama to attend Denmark climate summit
  5. Climate czar rejects doctored data claims

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Blades downgraded

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.