The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Culture

Big Three hitting the big bottom

By | Friday, January 2, 2009

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

MOTOR MATTERS

We can let Detroit fail. That's easy. Then what? How much do you think it will cost to support unemployed workers with no health insurance and no pensions - much, much more than $25 billion. General Motors Corp.'s failure could also take down Ford Co., Chrysler LLC and more than 1,000 suppliers

The failure of American automakers could kill our manufacturing base for years to come. Detroit didn't cause the credit mess. Banks and Wall Streeters caused it and Detroit got caught in it. The credit lockdown is killing car purchases. Total vehicle sales have gone from a high of 17.5 million to a predicted 11 million next year.

That hurts every company, not just Detroit.

Locally, dealers won't be buying any Little League uniforms or supporting the Lions Club. Blame banks if there are no green cars because automakers are out of money for research and development. Billions of dollars have been invested in raising fuel economy standards and dramatically lowering carbon emissions.

However, there are no miracles when it comes to complex technologies. Defunct car companies don't invest in new technology. Washington demands a plan from auto companies in exchange for loan guarantees, not free money. In the 1980s, Chrysler got a loan guarantee, paid it back and the taxpayers made $350 million on the deal. And check this out: No plan required from Citibank for $800 billion from the government, an obscene amount of money that we'll probably never see again.

We need our cars to get us to work and to the hospital at 2 a.m. when there's a medical emergency. Are we going to trust our livelihoods and lives to a bankrupt company?

Detroit doesn't need mandated restructuring. It has closed plants, reduced its work force, negotiated with the unions for two-tier wage structure. It has handed off health care administration to the union. It can do the rest itself.

Foreign car companies have cost advantages. GM is paying out $5.6 billion in health care costs this year for 1.1 million people covered by its plans; Toyota has a younger work force and only 375 retirees in the U.S.

The foreign automakers all got billions of dollars in local subsidies to build brand new plants in the South. American car companies such as Mercury, Ford, Jaguar, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Pontiac, Lincoln and Buick are ranked along with Honda, Infiniti, Lexus, Mercedes, Audi and Hyundai as above average in the recent J.D. Powers and Associates Initial Quality Study. (Consumers just can't get that through their heads.)

Detroit needs breathing room and better management. Detroit is changing and it is making cars that people want to buy: the all-new 2009 Ford Flex, Chevy Malibu and Cadillac CTS, for example. An auto company can be saved with one desirable vehicle. The minivan and the K-car saved Iacocca's Chrysler. The Taurus saved Ford. Way back, the Rambler saved American Motors Corp. The Beetle saved VW. Chevy has the Cruze and Camaro coming soon and Ford has the Fiesta. Good stuff.

Help Detroit.

Ford has great new product and a good leader. The Chevy Cruze, which is being sold in Europe, could put GM back on track. I'm not sure what's left to save at Chrysler. Maybe Jeep, maybe the minivan.

Copyright, Motor Matters, 2008

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • General Motors Corporation showed off its green wares at the Electric Drive Transportation Association conference in December. Associated Press.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Inside the Ring
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. Senate delays climate bill until September
  4. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  5. Health, climate reforms hit roadblocks

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  5. Israeli know-how
  6. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. YON: Girl with no future
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.